ArticleBMC medical imaging2025
Deep learning models based on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging and clinical parameters for identifying synchronous liver metastases from rectal cancer.
Article in BMC medical imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Artificial intelligence for the prediction of synchronous and metachronous liver metastasis in colorectal cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2026Pooled it
- TSNet: a multi-modal deep learning framework for subtyping appendicitis: integrating ultrasound images, handcrafted features, and clinical data.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2026Article
- Radiomics' Role in Predicting Distant Metastases, Recurrence and Survival Outcome in Rectal Cancer: A Systematic Review.Cancers · 2026Review
- Identification of KRAS mutation in rectal cancer based on a 2.5D deep learning model.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesTo establish and validate deep learning (DL) models based on pre-treatment multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) images of primary rectal cancer and basic clinical data for the prediction of synchronous liver metastases (SLM) in patients with Rectal cancer (RC).
methodsIn this retrospective study, 176 and 31 patients with RC who underwent multiparametric MRI from two centers were enrolled in the primary and external validation cohorts, respectively. Clinical factors, including sex, primary tumor site, CEA level, and CA199 level were assessed. A clinical feature (CF) model was first developed by multivariate logistic regression, then two residual network DL models were constructed based on multiparametric MRI of primary cancer with or without CF incorporation. Finally, the SLM prediction models were validated by 5-fold cross-validation and external validation. The performance of the models was evaluated by decision curve analysis (DCA) and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis.
resultsAmong three SLM prediction models, the Combined DL model integrating primary tumor MRI and basic clinical data achieved the best performance (AUC = 0.887 in primary study cohort; AUC = 0.876 in the external validation cohort). In the primary study cohort, the CF model, MRI DL model, and Combined DL model achieved AUCs of 0.816 (95% CI: 0.750, 0.881), 0.788 (95% CI: 0.720, 0.857), and 0.887 (95% CI: 0.834, 0.940) respectively. In the external validation cohort, the CF model, DL model without CF, and DL model with CF achieved AUCs of 0.824 (95% CI: 0.664, 0.984), 0.662 (95% CI: 0.461, 0.863), and 0.876 (95% CI: 0.728, 1.000), respectively.
conclusionThe combined DL model demonstrates promising potential to predict SLM in patients with RC, thereby making individualized imaging test strategies. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: Accurate synchronous liver metastasis (SLM) risk stratification is important for treatment planning and prognosis improvement. The proposed DL signature may be employed to better understand an individual patient's SLM risk, aiding in treatment planning and selection of further imaging examinations to personalize clinical decisions. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.