ArticleBMC psychiatry2025
Exploring non-medical prescribing for patients with mental illness: a scoping review.
Article in BMC psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluating pharmacist independent prescribing for patients with mental illness in community care: a qualitative study.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2025Article
- Clinical pharmacist prescriber in primary care in Slovenia: prospective non-randomised interventional study focused on clinical outcomes and quality of life.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundNon-medical prescribing (NMP) qualifications extend prescribing authority to nurses, pharmacists, and other allied health professionals and are advocated as a means to help improve healthcare efficiency and access to services. However, despite non-medical prescribers (NMPs) being utilised in some countries for more than two decades, less is known about their role and impact in the mental health context. This scoping review therefore aims to map published research evidence concerning NMP for patients with mental illness.
methodsFive electronic databases were searched from January 2003 to July 2024. Reference lists of identified papers were also checked for relevant studies. Full text primary research studies exploring the nature, impact, and implementation of NMP services for patients with mental illness and dementia in community settings were included.
resultsFrom 22,547 retrieved papers, 63 studies were included. Of these, 57 (90.4%) detailed the nature (including the service or team they were based in, medicines prescribed, and main role(s)) of NMPs, 45 (71.4%) assessed the impact of services, and 16 (25.3%) explored factors influencing service implementation and delivery. The majority of studies originated from the USA (30/63, 47.6%), or the United Kingdom (27/63, 42.8%). Either nurse (44/63, 69.8%), pharmacist (16/63, 25.3%) or non-medical prescribing models featuring both professionals were exclusively studied (3/63, 4.7%). In the UK and USA, antidepressants (60%, 54.5%) were the most prescribed by NMPs. Although the conditions of patients managed by both nurse and pharmacist prescribers were reported to be well managed based on clinical outcomes (3/24, 12.5% and 3/13, 23%, respectively), few studies evaluated health outcomes. Training-related barriers to service delivery were commonly mentioned in UK studies (4/9, 44.4%), with financial issues reported in the USA (2/4, 50%).
conclusionsThis review highlights the diverse roles of NMPs in the care of people with mental illness. Whilst the limited evidence suggests a positive impact on patient care, more quantitative research is needed. Given the focus on nursing prescriber models in this review, along with rising mental health demand and continuing staff shortages, future research should prioritise exploring and evaluating the contribution of pharmacist NMP services as well other healthcare professionals' NMPs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.