ArticleBMC cancer2025
Prediction of prognosis of immune checkpoint inhibitors combined with anti-angiogenic agents for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma by machine learning-based radiomics.
Article in BMC cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial intelligence and personalised medicine in liver cancer.Journal of hepatology · 2026Review
- Review
- Emerging Role of MRI-Based Artificial Intelligence in Individualized Treatment Strategies for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Narrative Review.Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesThis study aims to develop and validate a novel radiomics model utilizing magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to predict progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC) who are receiving a combination of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and antiangiogenic agents. This is an area that has not been previously explored using MRI-based radiomics.
methods111 patients with uHCC were enrolled in this study. After performing univariate cox regression and the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) algorithms to extract radiological features, the Rad-score was calculated through a Cox proportional hazards regression model and a random survival forest (RSF) model. The optimal calculation method was selected by comparing the Harrell's concordance index (C-index) values. The Rad-score was then combined with independent clinical risk factors to create a nomogram. C-index, time-dependent receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves, calibration curves, and decision curve analysis were employed to assess the forecast ability of the risk models.
resultsThe combined nomogram incorporated independent clinical factors and Rad-score calculated by RSF demonstrated better prognosis prediction for PFS, with C-index of 0.846, 0.845, separately in the training and the validation cohorts. This indicates that our model performs well and has the potential to enable more precise patient stratification and personalized treatment strategies. Based on the risk level, the participants were classified into two distinct groups: the high-risk signature (HRS) group and the low-risk signature (LRS) group, with a significant difference between the groups (P < 0.01).
conclusionThe effective clinical-radiomics nomogram based on MRI imaging is a promising tool in predicting the prognosis in uHCC patients receiving ICIs combined with anti-angiogenic agents, potentially leading to more effective clinical outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.