Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40389875›Full record

ArticleBMC medical imaging2025

Multiple deep learning models based on MRI images in discriminating glioblastoma from solitary brain metastases: a multicentre study.

Chao Kong, Ding Yan, Kai Liu, Yong Yin, Changsheng Ma

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Chao KongDepartment of Graduate, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, China.
Ding YanSchool of Control Science and Engineering, Shandong University, Jinan, China.
Kai LiuDepartment of Head and Neck Comprehensive Radiotherapy, Affiliated Tumor Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, China.
Yong YinDepartment of Radiation Physics, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, China. yinyongsd@126.com.
Changsheng MaDepartment of Radiation Physics, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, China. machangsheng_2000@126.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveDevelopment of a deep learning model for accurate preoperative identification of glioblastoma and solitary brain metastases by combining multi-centre and multi-sequence magnetic resonance images and comparison of the performance of different deep learning models.

methodsClinical data and MR images of a total of 236 patients with pathologically confirmed glioblastoma and single brain metastases were retrospectively collected from January 2019 to May 2024 at Provincial Hospital of Shandong First Medical University, and the data were randomly divided into a training set and a test set according to the ratio of 8:2, in which the training set contained 197 cases and the test set contained 39 cases; the images were preprocessed and labeled with the tumor regions. The images were pre-processed and labeled with tumor regions, and different MRI sequences were input individually or in combination to train the deep learning model 3D ResNet-18, and the optimal sequence combinations were obtained by five-fold cross-validation enhancement of the data inputs and training of the deep learning models 3D Vision Transformer (3D Vit), 3D DenseNet, and 3D VGG; the working characteristic curves (ROCs) of subjects were plotted, and the area under the curve (AUC) was calculated. The area under the curve (AUC), accuracy, precision, recall and F1 score were used to evaluate the discriminative performance of the models. In addition, 48 patients with glioblastoma and single brain metastases from January 2020 to December 2022 were collected from the Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Shandong First Medical University as an external test set to compare the discriminative performance, robustness and generalization ability of the four deep learning models.

resultsIn the comparison of the discriminative effect of different MRI sequences, the three sequence combinations of T1-CE, T2, and T2-Flair gained discriminative effect, with the accuracy and AUC values of 0.8718 and 0.9305, respectively; after the four deep learning models were inputted into the aforementioned sequence combinations, the accuracy and AUC of the external validation of the 3D ResNet-18 model were 0.8125, respectively, 0.8899, all of which are the highest among all models.

conclusionsA combination of multi-sequence MR images and a deep learning model can efficiently identify glioblastoma and solitary brain metastases preoperatively, and the deep learning model 3D ResNet-18 has the highest efficacy in identifying the two types of tumours.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsDeep LearningGlioblastomaImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingAdultAgedDiagnosis, DifferentialFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesCompanion diagnostic systemDeep learningGlioblastomaMagnetic resonance imagingSolitary brain metastasis

Identifiers

PMID40389875
PMCPMC12090387

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.