ArticleBMC immunology2025
Evaluation of the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on depression, anxiety and psychological resilience in patients with primary immunodeficiency.
Article in BMC immunology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Psychological Symptoms in Patients with Inborn Errors of Immunity and Their Family Members: A Cross-Sectional Study.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPrimary immunodeficiencies (PIDs) are a group of diseases that develop as a result of primary or congenital malfunction of the immune system and progress with chronic and/or recurrent bacterial, fungal, protozoal and/or viral infections. In this study, we aimed to examine the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on depression, anxiety levels and psychological resilience in patients with PID and to compare them with those in controls.
methodsSeventy patients, aged 18-65 years, who were being followed up with a diagnosis of PID and 69 people as healthy control group, participated in our study. The participants were evaluated cross-sectionally once; sociodemographic data form, Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D), Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAM-A), Resilience Scale for Adults (RSA), and COVID-19 Evaluation form were administered to the participants.
resultsHAM-A and HAM-D scores were significantly higher in PID patients compared to controls (HAM-D: 5.5 vs. 3.0, p < 0.001; HAM-A: 6.0 vs. 4.0, p = 0.008). RSA was significantly lower in the patient group (RSA total: 122.5 vs. 136.0, p < 0.001), and pandemic-related risk perception was higher (PRPS: 33.9 vs. 28.3, p < 0.001). Sleep, appetite, and attention-related disturbances were also more common in the patient group. Multivariate regression analyses revealed that PID diagnosis was an independent predictor of increased depression severity (HAM-D), lower psychological resilience (RSA), and greater pandemic-related risk perception. Female sex was independently associated with higher anxiety severity (HAM-A). A personal psychiatric history and greater number of comorbidities were also significant predictors of psychological vulnerability, particularly in relation to depression and anxiety.
conclusionGiven the observed associations between PID and increased levels of depression, anxiety, and reduced psychological resilience during the pandemic, clinicians may consider heightened vigilance for psychological symptoms in this population during times of public health crisis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.