ArticleThe journal of headache and pain2025
GIANT: a prospective, multicenter, real-world study on the effectiveness, safety, and tolerability of atogepant in migraine patients with multiple therapeutic failures.
Article in The journal of headache and pain, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Interictal burden in migraine: a systematic review of conceptual domains and measurement properties of instruments.The journal of headache and pain · 2026Pooled it
- "The efficacy and safety of Atogepant for migraine prophylaxis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials".BMC neurology · 2025Pooled it
- Effectiveness of atogepant in migraine with and without medication overuse: Pooled real-world analysis of two independent clinical cohorts.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2026Observational
- Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of Atogepant in Migraine Patients from the UAE.Neurology and therapy · 2026Article
- Atogepant Reduces Psychological Dependence on Acute Treatments Evaluated With the Leeds Dependence Questionnaire: A Prospective Study.Brain and behavior · 2026Article
- Atogepant reduces triptan use: a pharmacoeconomic analysis in migraine prevention.The journal of headache and pain · 2026Observational
- Botulinum toxin for chronic migraine.Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996) · 2026Review
- Breaking the medication overuse headache cycle: from nociplastic pain mechanisms to patient-centered interventions - the Junior Editorial Board vision.The journal of headache and pain · 2026Review
- Interictal burden, not ictal burden, drives work productivity impairment in headache disorders: insights from a Japanese cross-sectional study.The journal of headache and pain · 2026Article
- Responders and super-responders to atogepant after 24 weeks of treatment in migraine: real-world evidence from the GIANT-2 study.The journal of headache and pain · 2026Observational
- Atogepant after anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies failure in migraine: a multicenter real-world study of effectiveness, safety, persistence and predictors of response.The journal of headache and pain · 2025Observational
- One-month atogepant treatment induces rapid changes in delta-band functional connectivity in migraine: an HD-EEG study.The journal of headache and pain · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
29 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAtogepant, the first oral CGRP receptor antagonist approved for migraine prevention, has demonstrated efficacy and safety in randomized clinical trials (RCT). However, prospective real-world data are lacking.
objectiveTo explore the effectiveness, safety, and tolerability of atogepant 60 mg at week 12 in patients with high-frequency episodic (HFEM: 8-14 days/month) or chronic migraine (CM) with multiple therapeutic failures.
methodsThis ongoing, multicenter (n = 16), prospective real-world study included consecutive adults with HFEM or CM who had failed ≥3 prior preventive treatments, according to AIFA criteria. Participants received atogepant 60 mg daily, with treatment planned for up to 12 months. PRIMARY ENDPOINT: change from baseline to week 12 in monthly migraine days (MMD) for HFEM and monthly headache days (MHD) for CM. Secondary endpoints: changes in monthly analgesic intake (MAI), pain intensity (NRS), disability (HIT-6, MIDAS), interictal burden (MIBS-4), treatment satisfaction (PGIC), responder rates (≥ 50%, ≥ 75%, 100%), and changes in migraine frequency during the first treatment week compared to the last pre-treatment week. Adverse events were monitored throughout.
resultsA total of 183 patients were enrolled and 82 completed ≥ 12 weeks of follow-up. Of these, 41.5% had previously failed anti-CGRP mAbs. At week 12, significant reductions (p < 0.001) were observed in MMD (-6.0) and MHD (-11.2). Secondary outcomes also improved significantly (p < 0.001): MAI (-10.9), NRS (-2.7), HIT-6 (-13.2), MIDAS (-61.1), and MIBS-4 (-5.4). Responder rates were 65.9% (≥ 50%), 36.6% (≥ 75%), and 6.1% (100%). PGIC documented high satisfaction (much/very much improved: 70.7%). A significant decrease (p < 0.001) in migraine frequency was already evident by week 1 (overall: - 2.5 days, HFEM: - 1.5, CM: - 3.1). In the mAb-failure subgroup, ≥ 50% and ≥ 75% response rates were 52.9% and 23.5%, with significant improvements in all primary and secondary endpoints (p < 0.001). Adverse events occurred in 5.5% of patients, and 1.6% discontinued treatment.
conclusionThe GIANT study provides real-world evidence of atogepant's effectiveness, safety, and tolerability in patients with HFEM and CM with multiple therapeutic failures and comorbidities. It extends RCT data by showing rapid onset of action, meaningful reductions in pain intensity and interictal disability, high patient satisfaction, and effectiveness even in patients with anti-CGRP mAb failures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.