ArticleBiological procedures online2025
Heterogeneity and efficacy of immunotherapy in multiple cancer: insights from a meta-analysis.
Article in Biological procedures online, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mechanisms and advances of drug resistance in colorectal cancer: A systematic overview of multi-layered regulatory networks.Translational oncology · 2026Review
- Pediatric patients with cancer exhibit increased neutrophil extracellular traps and reduced active deoxyribonuclease I: diagnostic, prognostic, and therapeutic opportunities.Clinical and experimental pediatrics · 2026Article
- Reported drug spectrum and disproportionality signals for malignant neoplasm progression in FAERS: a real-world pharmacovigilance study.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundImmunotherapy has been recognized as a significant advancement in cancer treatment by promoting the body's immune system to identify and eliminate cancer cells more effectively. Unlike conventional therapies, immunotherapy can enhance the natural capabilities of human immune system. Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy involves genetical-modified T-cells from patients to better catch and attack cancer cells. Up to date, CAR-T therapy has shown particular promise in treating certain types of leukemia and lymphoma, highlighting the transformative potential of immunotherapy.
resultsLiterature data search using PubMed, CNKI, and Wanfang were searched to collect eligible studies up to January 2025. The primary outcomes of complete response rate (CRR), objective response rate (ORR), dead rate (DR), and other adverse reactions were evaluated. Secondary outcomes (CRR, ORR, and DR) of subgroup analysis from different cancer types, origins, and outcomes for survival rate were analyzed for our final results. A total of 649 studies were initially identified through database searching. After removing duplicates and non-clinical cancer studies, 32 eligible studies were included in this work. The pooled data included 819 patients for objective response rate (ORR), 843 patients for complete response rate (CRR), and 868 patients for dead event. In the included studies, 24 reported ORR data, revealing an objective response rate of 84.86% (695/819) with little heterogeneity (OR: 0.87, 95% CI 0.80-0.91, P = < 0.01, I
conclusionsThis meta-analysis provides valuable insights into the potential of immunotherapy, particularly CAR-T, in cancer treatment. Findings showed the different efficacy and safety of immunotherapy in treating multiple cancers, with various objective response rates. Continued studies from more trials with different populations are needed to optimize their efficacy in further cancer treatment and precision medicine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.