ArticlePrenatal diagnosis2025
Clinical Outcome and Risk Factors for Progression of Prenatally Diagnosed Fetal Ventriculomegaly: A Retrospective Multicenter Study.
Article in Prenatal diagnosis, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Role of Fetal MRI in the Evaluation of Ventriculomegaly: A Scoping Review.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Pregnancy and early neurodevelopment after prenatal ventriculomegaly: a 2011-2024 single-center retrospective cohort of 983 cases.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2026Article
- Clinical characteristics and outcome of fetuses with ventriculomegaly: a retrospective multicenter study.Archives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2026Article
- Clinical Outcomes of Fetal Ventriculomegaly: A Retrospective Analysis from a Tertiary Referral Center.International journal of women's health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo investigate the clinical outcome of fetuses with ventriculomegaly (VM), and to identify risk factors for progression of fetal VM in order to improve prenatal counseling. This was a multicenter, retrospective cohort study, comprising 229 cases with VM.
methodsVM was classified as mild, moderate, or severe and isolated or non-isolated. Genetic data were collected. Differences between VM subgroups were described, and risk factors for progression of fetal VM were identified using logistic regression analysis. Outcome was defined as the percentage of live births, termination of pregnancy (TOP) and intra-uterine fetal demise (IUFD).
resultsOf the 229 cases, 109 (47.6%) had mild VM, 60 (26.2%) moderate VM, and 60 (26.2%) severe VM. Progression of VM occurred in 45/153 cases (29.4%), half of which were in the group with severe VM. Dilatation of the 3rd ventricle and neural tube defects were risk factors for progression of VM. The percentage of live births (excluding cases with TOP and unknown outcome) was 93.1% (54/58) in mild VM, 78.6% (22/28) in moderate VM and 92.6% (25/27) in severe VM. In 12/229 cases (5.2%) IUFD occurred. Genetic analysis was performed in 143/229 (62.4%) of cases, showing (likely) pathogenic abnormalities in 41/143 (28.7%) cases, predominantly in mild, non-isolated VM.
conclusionsThis study confirms the clinical relevance of additional genetic investigations in all types of fetal VMs. Further larger prospective research including clinical follow-up is needed to improve prenatal counseling.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.