Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40389804›Full record

ArticleNano letters2025

The Electric Field in Solid State Nanopores Causes Dissociation of Strong Biomolecular Interactions.

Wei Liu, John Andersson, Julia Järlebark, Amina Shaji, Jingjie Sha, Andreas Dahlin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nano letters, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Advanced healthcare materials · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Wei LiuJiangsu Key Laboratory for Design and Manufacture of Micro-Nano Biomedical Instruments, School of Mechanical Engineering, Southeast University, Nanjing 211189, China.
John AnderssonDepartment of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Chalmers University of Technology, 41296 Gothenburg, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-2977-8305
Julia JärlebarkDepartment of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Chalmers University of Technology, 41296 Gothenburg, Sweden.
Amina ShajiDepartment of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Chalmers University of Technology, 41296 Gothenburg, Sweden.
Jingjie ShaJiangsu Key Laboratory for Design and Manufacture of Micro-Nano Biomedical Instruments, School of Mechanical Engineering, Southeast University, Nanjing 211189, China.
Andreas DahlinDepartment of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Chalmers University of Technology, 41296 Gothenburg, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-1545-5860

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Electrical sensing with nanopores has become a widely used bioanalytical tool. However, it remains unclear if and how the extremely strong electric field generated inside the pores influences biomolecular interactions. Here we show that the field disrupts the strongest known protein-ligand interaction in biology, namely biotin-avidin bonds. Remarkably, the lifetime of the interaction is decreased by at least 4 orders of magnitude. At hundreds of mV, avidin (from egg-white) starts dissociating from biotin-functionalized nanopores over a time scale of minutes even at the maximum bond valency of four. Streptavidin-coated nanoparticles, which form many more bonds, remain bound but exhibit surface mobility due to the field. These results show that nanopore sensors can give very inaccurate results when used for affinity-based detection or biomolecular interaction analysis and that the pore environment should be regarded as potentially invasive for the molecules inside.

Indexed as

AvidinBiotinNanoporesProtein BindingStreptavidinAvidinBiotinStreptavidinavidinbiotinnanoporesproteinssensors

Identifiers

PMID40389804
PMCPMC12186603

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.