ArticleDiscover oncology2025
Novel marker genes and small molecule drugs for radiotherapy resistance in cervical cancer identified based on single-cell multi-omics analysis.
Article in Discover oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- A three-gene radioresistance signature predicts tumor progression in cervical cancer.Translational cancer research · 2026Article
- Cellular plasticity and heterogeneity underlying therapy resistance in 3D cervical cancer models.Hereditas · 2026Review
- Reprogramming the tumor immune microenvironment in cervical cancer: synergy between radiotherapy and immunotherapy.Molecular cancer · 2026Review
- Advancements in single-cell sequencing for cervical cancer research.Molecular and cellular biochemistry · 2026Review
- Immune heterogeneity and therapeutic resistance in gynecological malignancies.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Radiotherapy is the cornerstone of treatment for cervical cancer, yet the variability of patient response demands a deeper understanding of the molecular determinants of radioresistance. In this study, we investigated the molecular and cellular mechanisms of radioresistance in cervical cancer through a comprehensive multi-omics and machine learning approach. We downloaded and processed transcriptome sequencing, methylation and single-cell sequencing data from the TCGA and GEO databases. Differential gene and methylation analyses were performed to identify radioresistance-related markers. Single-cell data were processed using Seurat and annotated using CellTypist. Prognostic models were constructed and validated through downscaling, cell scoring, trajectory analysis and machine learning. Additionally, immune infiltration and drug sensitivity analyses were conducted. The differential analysis identified 845 up-regulated and 460 down-regulated genes associated with radioresistance. The methylation analysis identified 3042 down-regulated and 158 up-regulated gene loci. Single-cell sequencing revealed 43,475 cells and 13 cell types, with aneuploid cells predominantly present in epithelial cells. Cell scoring highlighted dispersed immune cells, with monocytes, ILCs, and T cells being the most relevant to radiotherapy resistance. The machine learning approach constructed a robust prognostic model using Cox regression and validated it on multiple datasets. The prognostic model demonstrated good predictive ability in assessing radiotherapy efficacy and immune infiltration. Drug screening identified several potential therapeutic candidates with high sensitivity for high-risk patients. This study provides a comprehensive multi-omics analysis and machine learning framework for identifying and validating molecular markers and prognostic models associated with radioresistance in cervical cancer, providing insights for personalized treatment strategies.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.