Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40389762›Full record

Observational studyInternational journal of implant dentistry2025

Clinical accuracy assessment of a dynamic navigation system and surgical guide using an oral appliance-secured patient tracker targeting anterior teeth.

Manabu Okubo, Koudai Nagata, Yurie Okuhama, Kana Wakamori, Hayato Tsuruoka, Kurumi Saito, Ryota Fumimoto, Hiromasa Kawana, Shinji Kuroda

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in International journal of implant dentistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Manabu Okubo *Department of Regenerative Implant Dentistry, Kanagawa Dental University, 82 Inaoka-cho, Yokosuka, 238-8580, Japan.
Koudai Nagata *Department of Regenerative Implant Dentistry, Kanagawa Dental University, 82 Inaoka-cho, Yokosuka, 238-8580, Japan.
Yurie OkuhamaDepartment of Regenerative Implant Dentistry, Kanagawa Dental University, 82 Inaoka-cho, Yokosuka, 238-8580, Japan.
Kana WakamoriDepartment of Regenerative Implant Dentistry, Kanagawa Dental University, 82 Inaoka-cho, Yokosuka, 238-8580, Japan.
Hayato TsuruokaDepartment of Regenerative Implant Dentistry, Kanagawa Dental University, 82 Inaoka-cho, Yokosuka, 238-8580, Japan.
Kurumi SaitoDepartment of Regenerative Implant Dentistry, Kanagawa Dental University, 82 Inaoka-cho, Yokosuka, 238-8580, Japan.
Ryota FumimotoDepartment of Regenerative Implant Dentistry, Kanagawa Dental University, 82 Inaoka-cho, Yokosuka, 238-8580, Japan.
Hiromasa KawanaDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Implantology, Kanagawa Dental University, 82 Inaoka- cho, Yokosuka, 238-8580, Japan.
Shinji KurodaDepartment of Regenerative Implant Dentistry, Kanagawa Dental University, 82 Inaoka-cho, Yokosuka, 238-8580, Japan. s.kuroda@kdu.ac.jp.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeDynamic navigation systems and surgical guides have been reported to be equally accurate. However, the accuracy of dynamic navigation systems is affected by the movement of the patient tracker fixed to the tooth. We hypothesized that fixing the patient tracker to the oral appliance could improve accuracy. Therefore, this study aimed to compare accuracy between a dynamic navigation system with a patient tracker fixed to an oral appliance and a surgical guide.

methodsThis observational study was conducted on patients who had undergone complete implant treatment at Kanagawa Dental University from 2020 to September 2024. Fifty implant bodies were placed in 42 patients with anterior tooth defects in both the dynamic navigation and surgical guide groups (25 implants each). DTX Studio™ (Nobel Biocare AG, Kloten, Switzerland) was used to overlay planning data on postoperative Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine data to calculate entry point, apex point, and angular deviation accuracy.

resultsThe entry point, apex point, and angular deviation values were 0.99 ± 0.33 mm, 0.97 ± 0.43 mm, and 2.64 ± 0.87° in the dynamic navigation group and 1.33 ± 0.26 mm, 1.38 ± 0.3 mm, and 3.42 ± 1.03° in the surgical guide group, respectively, differing significantly at all measurement sites (P < 0.01).

conclusionsThe fixation of the X-clip to the oral appliance improved intra-oral stability and inhibited intraoperative movement of the X-clip, resulting in high accuracy. These results suggest that dynamic navigation by oral appliance fixation is more accurate than surgical guides.

Indexed as

Dental Implantation, EndosseousSurgery, Computer-AssistedSurgical Navigation SystemsAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedDental implantDynamic navigation systemGuided surgerySurgical guide

Identifiers

PMID40389762
PMCPMC12089005

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.