ArticleSurgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA2025
Duplicate origin of the middle cerebral artery: a rare variant.
Article in Surgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Internal carotid artery-middle cerebral artery junction small arterial ring: A report of two cases diagnosed by magnetic resonance angiography.Radiology case reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The cerebral arterial circle exhibits considerable morphological variability. Variations in the middle cerebral artery (MCA) are infrequent occurrences that can be readily identified via imaging techniques. The current imaging report describes a rare variant of the MCA consisting of a duplicate origin, which was incidentally discovered in a 42-year-old female patient through computed tomography angiography. The duplicated origin of the MCA was identified on the left side of the cerebral arterial circle, forming an arterial ring with the temporopolar branch of the MCA originating from one of its limbs. The remainder of the arterial circle demonstrated no variants. It is essential to distinguish variants of the MCA without conflating them. The present variant is accurately characterized as a 'duplicate origin", it should not be confused with fenestrations, and has a reported prevalence of 0.1%. Comprehending such arterial variations is vital prior to undertaking endovascular or neurosurgical procedures in the region.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.