Trial reportScientific reports2025
Robotic flexible ureteroscopy system, Zamenix R, demonstrates efficacy and safety in initial clinical evaluation for retrograde intrarenal surgery.
Trial report in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Intraoperative use of artificial intelligence (AI) during endoscopic lithotripsy: a systematic review from EAU endourology.World journal of urology · 2025Pooled it
- Hybrid endoscopic-robotic approaches for complex upper urinary tract disorders: a systematic review and single-arm meta-analysis.Journal of robotic surgery · 2025Pooled it
- Simulation-based dosimetric analysis of surgeon radiation exposure during robotic-assisted versus conventional URS.World journal of urology · 2026Article
- Research landscape, knowledge structure, and emerging frontiers of robot-assisted surgery for urolithiasis: a bibliometric and visualization analysis.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Review
- Endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery: From percutaneous nephrolithotomy to the future of stone management.Investigative and clinical urology · 2026Review
- Safety and Efficacy of Flexible Ureteroscopy for Renal Stone Disease in Elderly Patients: A Scoping Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This initial clinical trial evaluated the efficacy and safety of the retrograde intrarenal surgery using the robotic flexible ureteroscopy system, Zamenix R, in a multi-center, prospective, single-arm study. A total of 47 adult Korean patients with one or more kidney stones, ranging in maximal size from 5 to 30 mm, were recruited, and 46 patients were included in the analysis. The median age of patients was 57.50 [IQR 48.25-63.00] years, with a median of 1.00 [IQR 1.00-2.00] stones per patient and a median maximal size of 13.70 [IQR, 10.00-16.00] mm and a volume of 349.65 [IQR 201.60-704.10] mm³. The stone-free rates were 93.48% (< 4 mm), 71.74% (< 2 mm), and 56.52% (zero stone), based on each respective stone-free definition, with no conversions to conventional surgery. The median operative time was 91.50 [IQR 64.25-113.75] minutes, with a median console time of 71.00 [IQR 39.25-92.75] minutes. Ureteral injuries occurred in 17.39% of cases, including 6.52% Grade I and 10.87% Grade II injuries, all related to manual insertion of a ureteral access sheath. The postoperative complication rate was 6.52%, with all cases being Grade II urinary tract infections. Laser ablation speed was higher for larger stones. The operators reported low levels of musculoskeletal fatigue and numbness. The results demonstrated the efficacy and safety of the robot-assisted flexible ureteroscopic surgery using Zamenix R. Further investigation is required, including a comparison with the standard of care and a larger sample size.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.