Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40389733›Full record

ArticleAesthetic plastic surgery2025

Public Perceptions and Religious Barriers to Surgical Facial Rejuvenation.

Shree Rath

Abstract readLetter
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Aesthetic plastic surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Shree RathAll India Institute of Medical Sciences Bhubaneswar, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, 751021, India. shreerath4a@gmail.com.ORCID 0009-0000-4273-0827

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This letter addresses the study by AlEnazi et al. on public perceptions and knowledge of surgical facial rejuvenation in Saudi Arabia. The letter points out several areas for improvement: potential sampling bias due to social media-based data collection, lack of reported results from initial questionnaire pilot testing, and inadequate exploration of religious concerns as barriers. The letter also suggests correlational analysis between income levels and willingness for procedures, as well as assessing satisfaction among those who underwent facial rejuvenation. Future research should focus on diverse population selection, longitudinal studies, and detailed exploration of specific barriers.Level of Evidence V This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticePublic OpinionRejuvenationReligionRhytidoplastyAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient SatisfactionSaudi ArabiaSurveys and QuestionnairesAttitude and practices (KAP)Facial rejuvenationKnowledgePlastic surgery

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.