ArticleScientific reports2025
Productivity, carbon sequestration and species diversity in virgin and secondary meadow steppes of the Bashkir Cis-Urals.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Steppes are of great importance for the global biogeochemical cycle and are characterized by high economic value. Carbon stocks in the soil of flat steppe landscapes are about one-fourth of the total carbon deposited in global soils. However, improper methods of pasture management, especially overgrazing, have a serious negative impact on the structure and functioning of steppes. The aim of this study is to analyze carbon accumulation in virgin and secondary meadow steppes in the Bashkir Cis-Urals (Russia) depending on various methods of agricultural use. The data were collected on 10 sample plots laid on cropland, as well as in secondary and virgin meadow steppes. It was found that secondary meadow steppes on fallow lands abandoned for about 20-45 years are close to virgin steppes in terms of the dominant species composition but differ by low floristic diversity, a different proportion of steppe specialist species and lower root phytomass (60-100% lower than in the virgin steppe). The phytomass of all fractions of plant matter was the highest in virgin steppe. Under moderate agricultural use (occasional and moderate haymaking or grazing), the succession goes towards the restoration of steppe community structure and soil organic carbon content. Intensive grazing slows down the restorative succession and reduces the organic carbon content in the soil. Compared with the meadow steppes located at the foot and the lower part of the hill, the steppes of upper and middle parts of the same slope have a high stock of above-ground phytomass but contain less carbon in the soil due to water erosion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.