ArticleHypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension2025
Comparison between sacubitril/valsartan and thiazide diuretics among patients with uncontrolled hypertension in Japan.
Article in Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Retrospective analysis of influences of sacubitril/valsartan in patients with diabetes with poorly controlled blood pressure in Japan.Journal of diabetes investigation · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Although renin-angiotensin system (RAS) inhibitors and calcium channel blockers are widely used to treat hypertension in Japan, <10% of patients use thiazides. This study aimed to evaluate differences in the efficacy and safety of sacubitril/valsartan and thiazide diuretics. Patients with poor blood pressure (BP) control, despite combination treatment with RAS inhibitors and calcium channel blockers, were included in the study. Patients treated with thiazides (THZ group, n = 306) and those who switched from RAS inhibitors to sacubitril/valsartan (SacVal group, n = 433) were compared. Propensity score analysis with inverse probability weighting was performed. A significantly higher target BP achievement rate was observed in the SacVal group than in the THZ group (4 months, 37% vs. 26%, p < 0.001). In a general linear mixed model, significant decreases in office and home BP were observed in both groups (p < 0.001); however, no significant interaction effects were observed between the drug type and time course. Discontinuation of the treatment by adverse events was significantly more frequent in THZ group (10%) than in SacVal group (3%), with a hazard ratio [95% confidence interval] of 3.47 [1.78, 6.76] (p < 0.001). In the model using the propensity score, compared with THZ group, significantly lower levels of office and home systolic BP, uric acid, glycated hemoglobin A
Indexed as
Identifiers
40389636What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.