ArticleHypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension2025
Combined pre-dialysis systolic blood pressure and pulse rate assessment for 1-year all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in patients on hemodialysis: a nationwide cohort study.
Article in Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The prognostic utility of the combined assessment of pre-hemodialysis systolic blood pressure (SBP) and pulse rate compared to their independent assessment is unclear. In this nationwide cohort study, we aimed to determine whether their combined assessment could enhance the prognostic utility in patients on maintenance hemodialysis using the Japanese Renal Data Registry database. Exposure was defined as a combination of SBP and pulse rate. Forty-eight levels of exposure groups were created: SBP (<100, 100- < 120, 120- < 140, 140- < 160 [reference], 160- < 180, and ≥180 mmHg) and pulse rate (<50, 50- < 60, 60- < 70 [reference], 70- < 80, 80- < 90, 90- < 100, 100- < 110, and ≥110 beats/min). The primary and secondary outcomes were 1-year all-cause and cardiovascular mortalities, respectively. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards models were used, and multiplicative and additive interactions were assessed. The combined model for mortality and cardiac mortality was statistically better than the separate SBP and pulse rate model. Lower SBP was associated with higher risk of all-cause mortality irrespective of pulse rate. Most categories of lower SBP or higher pulse rate vs. the 120- < 140 mmHg and 70- < 80 beats/min category had positive relative excess risk due to interactions, with similar findings observed for cardiac mortality. Combined assessment of pre-dialysis SBP and pulse rate may help the simple stratification of patients with excess risks that cannot be identified by separate SBP and pulse rate assessment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40389635What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.