ArticleJournal of human genetics2025
ACMG secondary findings in the Brazilian rare genomes project: insights from 5402 genome sequencing.
Article in Journal of human genetics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Genomas Brasil program: building precision public health within Brazil's Unified Health System.Nature medicine · 2026Article
- Whole-genome sequencing in Brazilian patients with neurofibromatosis type 1, including novel variants, incidental findings, and dual diagnoses.Einstein (Sao Paulo, Brazil) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
22 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Secondary findings (SF) are pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants in genes unrelated to the primary purpose of genetic testing. The American College of Medical Genetics (ACMG) provides guidelines on which SF should be reported, involving 81 genes linked to different conditions. With the increasing use of genome sequencing (GS), SF are more frequently detected, presenting challenges for healthcare systems. The Brazilian population is often underrepresented in genomic studies, which limits population-specific knowledge. This study aimed to outline the profile of SF in the Brazilian Rare Genomes Project (BRGP). We analyzed retrospectively SF (ACMG) data from GS of 5402 BRGP individuals. Of the 5316 cases who consented to receive SF, 3.6% (191 cases) had at least one SF. The most common genes identified were TTR, TTN, and BRCA2. SF were mainly related to cardiovascular conditions (40.2%) and cancer predisposition (37.6%). Some variants, such as TTR: c.424G>A; p. (Val142Ile) and TP53: c.1010G>A; p. (Arg337His), were recurrent, reflecting population-specific traits and founder effects. Novel variants were 10.6% of SF. SF rate varies across studies and populations. While SF can aid early diagnosis, their relevance is debated due to potential psychological and healthcare burdens. Effective genetic counseling and public health policies are essential.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40389634What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.