Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40389541›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

A disproportionality analysis of adverse events associated with ertapenem using the FAERS database from 2004 to 2024.

Fengjie Tang, Yue He, Wenting Ou, Na Yang, Xueling Bai

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Fengjie Tang *Department of Respiratory Medicine, Chongqing Emergency Medical Center, Chongqing University Central Hospital, 1 Jiankang Road, Yuzhong District, Chongqing, 400014, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0005-4037-1193
Yue He *Nursing School of Zunyi Medical University, 6 Xuefu West Road, Xinpu New District, Zunyi, Guizhou, 563006, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0003-6027-9357
Wenting OuDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Chongqing Emergency Medical Center, Chongqing University Central Hospital, 1 Jiankang Road, Yuzhong District, Chongqing, 400014, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0007-4469-6184
Na YangDepartment of Neurology, Chongqing Emergency Medical Center, Chongqing University Central Hospital, 1 Jiankang Road, Yuzhong District, Chongqing, 400014, China. yangna8704@163.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0001-3985-4324
Xueling BaiDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Chongqing Emergency Medical Center, Chongqing University Central Hospital, 1 Jiankang Road, Yuzhong District, Chongqing, 400014, China. xuelingwork@163.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0008-0172-8702

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Through an in-depth analysis of ertapenem-associated adverse events (AEs) in the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database, this study provides a reference for monitoring and safety management of ertapenem. Data from the FAERS database from Q1 2004 to Q1 2024 were analyzed via four nonproportional analysis techniques, including the reporting odds ratio (ROR). Gender, age, and sensitivity analyses were conducted for a more detailed assessment of ertapenem-associated signals. A total of 2,931 reports with ertapenem as the primary suspected drug were collected, covering 27 system organ classes (SOCs). The two SOCs with the strongest signals were nervous system disorders and psychiatric disorders, with overall stronger signals in individuals aged ≥ 65 years. The most frequently reported AEs were confusional state (n = 265) and convulsions (n = 214). Among the strongest signals were oropharyngeal edema (ROR = 191.05, 95% CI: 60.76-601.35) and granulomatous dermatitis (ROR = 150.49, 95% CI: 55.9-405.15). Eleven AEs not listed on the FDA label were identified. The top 20 AEs were predominantly associated with nervous system and psychiatric disorders, with a median time to onset ranging from 3.5 to 8.5 days. This study highlights the neuropsychiatric risks of ertapenem, providing strong evidence for its safety assessment and emphasizing the need for monitoring and individualized management in high-risk patients. Ertapenem, FAERS, Adverse events, Drug safety, Disproportionality analysis.

Indexed as

Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting SystemsAnti-Bacterial AgentsDrug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsErtapenemAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overChildChild, PreschoolDatabases, FactualFemaleHumansInfantMaleMiddle AgedAnti-Bacterial AgentsErtapenem

Identifiers

PMID40389541
PMCPMC12089491

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.