ArticleScientific reports2025
A disproportionality analysis of adverse events associated with ertapenem using the FAERS database from 2004 to 2024.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Real-world safety profile of eravacycline compared with tigecycline, minocycline, and meropenem: a comparative pharmacovigilance analysis of the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS).Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2026Article
- Ertapenem-Associated Neurotoxicity in a Patient With Chronic Kidney Disease and Hypothyroidism: A Case Report.Cureus · 2026Article
- Safety evaluation of finerenone and identification of factors contributing to nephrotoxicity: re-analysis using FDA adverse event reporting system data.International urology and nephrology · 2026Article
- Cross national pharmacovigilance analysis of drug-induced delirium: a comparative study using the US FAERS, Japanese JADER, and canadian CVAR datasets.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Article
- A pharmacist-led framework for antibiotic-associated liver injury: from pharmacovigilance signals to bedside surveillance with the updated RUCAM and susceptibility markers.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Review
- Safety profile of entrectinib in NSCLC: Multi-source pharmacovigilance analysis using FAERS and JADER.PloS one · 2026Article
- Comparative safety signals of carboplatin and cisplatin in lung cancer: a pharmacovigilance study based on FAERS.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Cardiac arrhythmias following COVID-19 vaccination: insights from the U.S. vaccine adverse event reporting system (VAERS), December 2020-January 2025, United States.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Through an in-depth analysis of ertapenem-associated adverse events (AEs) in the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database, this study provides a reference for monitoring and safety management of ertapenem. Data from the FAERS database from Q1 2004 to Q1 2024 were analyzed via four nonproportional analysis techniques, including the reporting odds ratio (ROR). Gender, age, and sensitivity analyses were conducted for a more detailed assessment of ertapenem-associated signals. A total of 2,931 reports with ertapenem as the primary suspected drug were collected, covering 27 system organ classes (SOCs). The two SOCs with the strongest signals were nervous system disorders and psychiatric disorders, with overall stronger signals in individuals aged ≥ 65 years. The most frequently reported AEs were confusional state (n = 265) and convulsions (n = 214). Among the strongest signals were oropharyngeal edema (ROR = 191.05, 95% CI: 60.76-601.35) and granulomatous dermatitis (ROR = 150.49, 95% CI: 55.9-405.15). Eleven AEs not listed on the FDA label were identified. The top 20 AEs were predominantly associated with nervous system and psychiatric disorders, with a median time to onset ranging from 3.5 to 8.5 days. This study highlights the neuropsychiatric risks of ertapenem, providing strong evidence for its safety assessment and emphasizing the need for monitoring and individualized management in high-risk patients. Ertapenem, FAERS, Adverse events, Drug safety, Disproportionality analysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.