ArticleScientific reports2025
The adverse effects of chemotherapy on bone mass are not prevented by senolytics.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Polyphenol‑based interventions in breast cancer: Signaling pathways, molecular mechanisms and translational therapeutic strategies (Review).Oncology reports · 2026Review
- Cellular senescence and the SASP in skeletal ageing: convergent mechanisms of progressive bone loss in osteoporosis.Biogerontology · 2026Review
- Targeting cellular senescence mitigates chemotherapy-induced bone loss in young and aged mice.GeroScience · 2026Article
- Tumor survivors' musculoskeletal health assessment: advances in imaging biomarkers for cancer treatment-related sequelae.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2026Review
- Juvenile Doxorubicin Exposure Causes Lasting Trabecular Bone Loss in Mice: A Preclinical Model of Long-Term Skeletal Damage.Cancers · 2026Article
- Chemotherapy-induced adipo-lineage cell senescence drives bone loss.Nature communications · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cancer survivors experience many short- and long-term side effects caused by chemotherapy, including low bone mineral density and deterioration of bone microarchitecture. Administration of chemotherapy drugs to disease free mice causes rapid bone loss. However, whether the bone effects persist throughout life and the mechanisms responsible remain unclear. One plausible cause of chemotherapy-induced bone loss is cellular senescence. Here, female mice were administered doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide and docetaxel, a chemotherapy regimen commonly used in breast cancer patients, in combination with two types of drugs that kill senescent cells (senolytics), namely dasatinib + quercetin or piperlongumine. Mice receiving chemotherapy experienced a rapid decrease in trabecular bone mass, which was detectable two weeks after initiation of treatment and was associated with increased expression of senescence markers. None of the senolytics prevented the effects of chemotherapy on bone mass. In separate experiments, we examined the skeletal effects of chemotherapy six and twelve months after the cessation of treatment. The deleterious effects of chemotherapy on bone mass remained up to 12 months after cessation of treatment, while no markers of senescence could be detected in bone. Together, these results suggest that the deleterious effects of this chemotherapy regimen on bone health are not due to the accumulation of senescent cells.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.