ArticleScientific reports2025
Preliminary evaluation of a neurological clinical pathway for the early detection of leprosy in low-endemic settings: A single-center exploratory study.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The early diagnosis of leprosy remains challenging in low-endemic regions. However, the implementation of clinical pathways (CPs) to improve diagnostic accuracy and understand patterns of misdiagnosis and delayed diagnosis may help reduce disability burdens. We conducted neurologist training programs focused on leprosy-related disabilities in Beijing, China, and evaluated the effectiveness of an exploratory neurological CP. Diagnostic delays and misdiagnosis patterns were analyzed. Following CP implementation (2018–2023), the number of confirmed leprosy referrals from neurology departments increased to 13 cases (vs. 4 cases during 1990–2017). The cases included various subtypes (LL, BL, BB, BT, TT, PNL). The diagnostic intervals ranged from 1.5 months (PNL) to 25 years (LL from low-endemic regions). All confirmed cases required multidisciplinary consultations (neurology: 27 visits; dermatology: 6 visits). Common misdiagnoses included peripheral neuropathy (29 instances) and skin lesions (13 instances). The neurological CP implemented in this study has potential utility for early leprosy detection in low-endemic settings. However, the single-center design and small sample size necessitate multicenter validation. These findings underscore the need for integrated diagnostic approaches.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.