Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40389505›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Improved Lyrebird optimization for multi microgrid sectionalizing and cost efficient scheduling of distributed generation.

Karthik Nagarajan, Arul Rajagopalan, Mohit Bajaj, Valliappan Raju, Vojtech Blazek, Lukas Prokop

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Karthik NagarajanDepartment of Electrical and Electronics Engg, Hindustan Institute of Technology and Science, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
Arul RajagopalanCentre for Smart Grid Technologies, School of Electrical Engineering, Vellore Institute of Technology, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, 600 127, India. rarul@vit.ac.in.
Mohit BajajHourani Center for Applied Scientific Research, Al-Ahliyya Amman University, Amman, Jordan. mohitbajaj.ee@geu.ac.in.
Valliappan RajuDirector of Research, Perdana University, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Vojtech BlazekENET Centre, CEET, VSB-Technical University of Ostrava, 708 00, Ostrava, Czech Republic.
Lukas ProkopENET Centre, CEET, VSB-Technical University of Ostrava, 708 00, Ostrava, Czech Republic.

Funding

European Union CZ.10.03.01/00/22_003/0000048ExPEDite 101139527National Centre for Energy II TN02000025
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The rising energy demand, substantial transmission and distribution losses, and inconsistent power quality in remote regions highlight the urgent need for innovative solutions to ensure a stable electricity supply. Microgrids (MGs), integrated with distributed generation (DG), offer a promising approach to address these challenges by enabling localized power generation, improved grid flexibility, and enhanced reliability. This paper introduces the Improved Lyrebird Optimization Algorithm (ILOA) for optimal sectionalizing and scheduling of multi-microgrid systems, aiming to minimize generation costs and active power losses while ensuring system reliability. To enhance search efficiency, ILOA incorporates the Levy Flight technique for local search, which introduces adaptive step sizes with long-distance jumps, improving the exploration-exploitation balance. Unlike conventional local search strategies that rely on fixed step sizes, Levy Flight prevents premature convergence by allowing the algorithm to escape local optima and explore the solution space more effectively. Additionally, a chaotic sine map is integrated to enhance global search capability, ensuring better diversity and superior optimization performance compared to traditional algorithms. Simulation studies are conducted on a modified 33-bus distribution system segmented into three independent microgrids. The algorithm is evaluated under single-objective scenarios (cost and loss minimization) and a multi-objective optimization framework combining both objectives. In single-objective optimization, ILOA achieves a generation cost of $19,254.64/hr with 0.7118 kW of power loss, demonstrating marginal improvements over the standard Lyrebird Optimization Algorithm and significant gains over Genetic Algorithm (GA) and Jaya Algorithm (JAYA). In multi-objective optimization, ILOA surpasses competing methods by achieving a generation cost of $89,792.18/hr and 10.26 kW of power loss. The optimization results indicate that, for the IEEE-33 bus system without considering EIR, the proposed ILOA algorithm achieves savings of approximately 0.0014%, 0.0041%, and 0.657% in operation costs compared to LOA, JAYA, and GA, respectively, when MG-1, MG-2, and MG-3 are operational. The analysis of real power loss reduction demonstrates that, in the IEEE-33 bus system without considering EIR, the proposed ILOA algorithm effectively minimizes power loss by approximately 0.692%, 1.696%, and 1.962% in comparison to LOA, JAYA, and GA, respectively, under the operational conditions of MG-1, MG-2, and MG-3. Additionally, reliability constraints based on the Energy Index of Reliability (EIR) are effectively incorporated, further validating the robustness of the proposed approach. Considering EIR, the real power loss analysis for the IEEE-33 bus system highlights that the proposed ILOA algorithm achieves a reduction of approximately 1.319%, 2.069%, and 2.134% in comparison to LOA, JAYA, and GA, respectively, under the operational scenario where MG-1, MG-2, and MG-3 are active. The results confirm that ILOA is a highly efficient and reliable solution for distributed generation scheduling and multi-microgrid sectionalizing, showcasing its potential for real-world applications such as dynamic economic dispatch and demand response integration in smart grid systems.

Indexed as

Active power lossDistributed generatorsEnergy index of reliability (EIR)Generation cost minimizationLyrebird optimization algorithmMulti-microgridsMulti-objective optimizationOptimal scheduling

Identifiers

PMID40389505
PMCPMC12089467

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.