ArticleScientific reports2025
Semiautomated segmentation of breast tumor on automatic breast ultrasound image using a large-scale model with customized modules.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Research on pedestrian recognition in complex scenarios based on data augmentation using large language models.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
To verify the capability of the Segment Anything Model for medical images in 3D (SAM-Med3D), tailored with low-rank adaptation (LoRA) strategies, in segmenting breast tumors in Automated Breast Ultrasound (ABUS) images. This retrospective study collected data from 329 patients diagnosed with breast cancer (average age 54 years). The dataset was randomly divided into training (n = 204), validation (n = 29), and test sets (n = 59). Two experienced radiologists manually annotated the regions of interest of each sample in the dataset, which served as ground truth for training and evaluating the SAM-Med3D model with additional customized modules. For semi-automatic tumor segmentation, points were randomly sampled within the lesion areas to simulate the radiologists' clicks in real-world scenarios. The segmentation performance was evaluated using the Dice coefficient. A total of 492 cases (200 from the "Tumor Detection, Segmentation, and Classification Challenge on Automated 3D Breast Ultrasound (TDSC-ABUS) 2023 challenge") were subjected to semi-automatic segmentation inference. The average Dice Similariy Coefficient (DSC) scores for the training, validation, and test sets of the Lishui dataset were 0.75, 0.78, and 0.75, respectively. The Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) categories of all samples range from BI-RADS 3 to 6, yielding an average DSC coefficient between 0.73 and 0.77. By categorizing the samples (lesion volumes ranging from 1.64 to 100.03 cm
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.