ArticleScientific reports2025
Research on driving factors of consumer purchase intention of artificial intelligence creative products based on user behavior.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Nostalgia proneness and acceptance of AI-designed cultural products: the mediating role of perceived authenticity and the moderating role of need for uniqueness.BMC psychology · 2026Article
- User emotional mechanisms and consumption conversion in AI-generated trend toy blind boxes.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Understanding purchase intention for genAI-enabled museum cultural and creative products using a SOR model.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Research on user acceptance intention of artificial intelligence generated content for museum cultural and creative products.PloS one · 2026Article
- How generative AI shapes designers' cultural heritage revitalization intention: process and content cues in AI-assisted cultural heritage design.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
With the continuous advancement of artificial intelligence (AI) technology, AIGC (AI-generated content) has increasingly permeated various sectors, leading to a significant transformation in the design industry. This study aims to explore user purchase intention and the influencing factors of AI-generated cultural and creative products, thereby formulating strategies to enhance user satisfaction. Based on the stimulus-organism-response theory, the theory of planned behavior, the value adoption model, the innovation diffusion theory, and the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology 2, a comprehensive model is constructed. The model also incorporates external variables such as perceived value (PV), perceived price (PP), social influence, hedonic motivation (HM), and cultural experience (CE). Additionally, self-innovation is considered as a key moderator to explore its role in moderating the relationships between PV, PP, and user perceived behavioral control. Using 526 valid samples, this study employs structural equation modeling to conduct exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis, and further verifies the importance of variables through artificial neural networks. The findings indicate that behavioral attitude, HM, PP, PV, and generative quality are the primary factors influencing user purchase intention. In the decision-making process, users not only consider the price and quality of the products but also place significant importance on the pleasurable experience and cultural uniqueness they offer. This study extends the theoretical application of AIGC in the field of cultural and creative consumption, enriches the user behavior research model, and provides practical insights for companies to optimize AI-generated cultural products, enhance user experience, and improve market acceptance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.