ArticleScientific reports2025
Feasibility of machine learning-based modeling and prediction to assess osteosarcoma outcomes.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Next-generation osteosarcoma models for precision medicine.Communications biology · 2026Review
- An international framework for clinical translation of molecular classifiers in osteosarcoma.NPJ precision oncology · 2026Article
- Molecular mechanism ofTranslational cancer research · 2026Article
- Comparative Molecular Insights and Computational Modeling of Multiple Myeloma and Osteosarcoma.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Integrative biomarker and drug target discovery in osteosarcoma: traditional experimental approaches and AI-enabled insights.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Osteosarcoma, an aggressive bone malignancy predominantly affecting children and adolescents, is characterized by a poor prognosis and high mortality rates. The development of reliable prognostic tools is critical for advancing personalized treatment strategies. However, identifying robust gene signatures to predict osteosarcoma outcomes remains a significant challenge. In this study, we analyzed gene expression data from 138 osteosarcoma samples across two multicenter cohorts and identified 14 consensus prognosis-associated genes via univariate Cox regression analysis. Using 66 combinations of 10 machine learning (ML) algorithms, we developed a machine learning-derived prognostic signature (MLDPS) optimized by the average C-index across TARGET, GSE21257, and merged cohorts. The MLDPS effectively stratified osteosarcoma patients into high- and low-risk score groups, achieving strong predictive performance for 1-, 3-, and 5-year overall survival (AUC range: 0.852 - 0.963). The MLDPS, comprising seven genes (CTNNBIP1, CORT, DLX2, TERT, BBS4, SLC7A1, NKX2-3), exhibited superior predictive accuracy compared to 10 established gene signatures. The findings of the MLDPS carry significant clinical implications for osteosarcoma treatment. Patients with a high-risk score demonstrated worse prognosis, increased metastasis risk, reduced immune infiltrations, and greater sensitivity to immunotherapy. Conversely, low-risk patients exhibited prolonged survival and distinct drug sensitivities. These findings underscore the potential of MLDPS to guide risk stratification, inform personalized therapeutic strategies, and improve clinical management in osteosarcoma.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.