Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40389458›Full record

ArticleNature communications2025

State-led climate action can cut emissions at near-federal costs but favors different technologies.

Gavin Mouat, Christopher Galik, Aranya Venkatesh, Katherine Jordan, Aditya Sinha, Paulina Jaramillo, Jeremiah X Johnson

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Gavin MouatCivil, Construction & Environmental Engineering, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA.
Christopher GalikSchool of Public and International Affairs, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0356-1861
Aranya VenkateshEngineering and Public Policy, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Katherine JordanEngineering and Public Policy, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Aditya SinhaCivil, Construction & Environmental Engineering, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2041-5679
Paulina JaramilloEngineering and Public Policy, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4214-1106
Jeremiah X JohnsonCivil, Construction & Environmental Engineering, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA. jjohns24@ncsu.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9602-4976

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the absence of comprehensive federal greenhouse gas mitigation policy, state-led strategies may play a pivotal role, particularly following the 2024 United States presidential election. Using a detailed energy system optimization model, we examine the outcomes of 23 climate-minded states pursuing net-zero emissions targets compared to a federal carbon cap achieving equivalent CO

Identifiers

PMID40389458
PMCPMC12089266

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.