Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40389437›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Prioritizing disability support systems by using Tamir's complex fuzzy Dombi aggregation operators.

Jabbar Ahmmad, Meraj Ali Khan, Ibrahim Al-Dayel, Tahir Mahmood

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jabbar AhmmadDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, International Islamic University Islamabad, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Meraj Ali KhanDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, College of Science, Imam Mohammad Ibn Saud Islamic University (IMSIU), 11566, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Ibrahim Al-DayelDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, College of Science, Imam Mohammad Ibn Saud Islamic University (IMSIU), 11566, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Tahir MahmoodDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, International Islamic University Islamabad, Islamabad, Pakistan. tahirbakhat@iiu.edu.pk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fuzzy sets can model the inherent ambiguity and subjectivity in disability assessment by allowing for flexible classification and decision-making. This contributes to the development of flexible clinical support systems that are effective in meeting individual needs. Subjective assessments of an individual's needs and talents are common in disability. Conventional clear-cut methodologies classify people as "disabled" or "not disabled," which may not fully reflect the wide range of disabilities. Fuzzy sets allow for degrees of membership, such as (a) Person A has 70% mobility impairment. (b) Person B needs 50% personal care support. This method takes into account the subjectivity and variability of disability assessments. Designing adaptive systems for people with disabilities requires the use of fuzzy sets for clinical support. For this purpose, we have proposed the theory of aggregation operators based on a complex fuzzy set. Aggregation operators help us to convert overall information to a single value that can help our clinical support system. Moreover, for the application of the delivered approach, we have proposed an algorithm and utilized this approach for the selection of the best disability support system. We have provided a comparative analysis of the defined theory to discuss the advantages of the initiated work.

Indexed as

Decision Support Systems, ClinicalDisability EvaluationFuzzy LogicPersons with DisabilitiesAlgorithmsHumansA Cartesian form of the complex fuzzy set; Dombi aggregation operatorsDisability support systemHuman disability

Identifiers

PMID40389437
PMCPMC12089341

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.