ArticleScientific reports2025
The diagnostic value of two-dimensional shear-wave elastography in identifying malignant lesions in lymph nodes: a prospective study.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Elastography for distinguishing lymphoma from benign and metastatic lymphadenopathy: a systematic review and Bayesian meta-analysis.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2026Pooled it
- Ex Vivo Shear-Wave Elastography for Intraoperative Prediction of Axillary Lymph Node Metastasis in Breast Cancer.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Article
- Dual-mode 3D shear wave elastography with qualitative and quantitative assessment improves diagnosis of inguinal lymph node metastasis.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026Article
- Lymph Node Assessment with Multiparametric Ultrasound: Normal Values, Morphologic Patterns, and Diagnostic Algorithms.Cancers · 2026Article
- Multimodal imaging of cervical lymphadenopathy: diagnostic value and clinical applications.Medicine and pharmacy reports · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study evaluates the diagnostic performance of two-dimensional shear wave elastography (2D-SWE) in differentiating between benign, metastatic lymph nodes (LNs) and lymphomas. From May 2022 to February 2023, a total of 137 patients who presented with unexplained LN enlargement were examined at the Ultrasound Medical Department of Union Hospital of Huazhong University of Science and Technology. The conventional ultrasound recorded the location, longitudinal diameter, transverse diameter, L/T ratio, blood supply mode, lymphatic hilum and 2D-SWE calculated the average elasticity (E) of LN. Histopathology was the diagnostic gold standard. A total of 124 patients with 159 superficial LNs were included (32 benign, 70 metastatic, 57 lymphoma). Malignant LNs had significantly higher E values than benign ones (49.38 ± 29.96 kPa vs. 25.00 ± 14.42 kPa, P < 0.001). When E > 25.46 kPa, the AUC, sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV and accuracy were 0.807, 0.787, 0.750, 0.926, 0.471 and 0.780, respectively, in identifying malignant LNs. For distinguishing benign LNs from lymphoma, the E cutoff was 25.03 kPa, with the AUC, sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV and accuracy of 0.727, 0.754, 0.719, 0.827, 0.622 and 0.742, respectively. To differentiate benign from metastatic LNs, an E cutoff of 36.97 kPa yielded an AUC, sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV and accuracy of 0.872, 0.757, 0.875, 0.930, 0.622 and 0.794, respectively. Comparing lymphoma and metastatic LNs, the E cutoff was 42.57 kPa. And the AUC, sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV and accuracy were 0.787, 0.700, 0.860, 0.860, 0.700 and 0.772, respectively. 2D-SWE parameter (the average elasticity) can effectively evaluate benign, metastatic LNs and lymphoma, which provides valuable information for preoperative evaluation of superficial LNs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.