Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40389321›Full record

SynthesisBMJ open2025

Changes in medical student attendance at in-person teaching sessions: a systematic review.

Palaniappan Ganesh Nagappan, Sapphire Rou Xi Tan, Shazia Absar, Samuel Brown, Sarah Sayers, Alex McManus, Anmol Arora, Isla Kuhn, Faris Khan, Edward Lau and 1 more

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Palaniappan Ganesh NagappanSchool of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK pgn25@cam.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9203-8836
Sapphire Rou Xi TanDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Shazia AbsarDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Samuel BrownUniversity of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Sarah SayersUniversity of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0003-8931-7361
Alex McManusUniversity of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Anmol AroraSchool of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4881-8293
Isla KuhnMedical Library, School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Faris KhanDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Edward LauDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Charlotte TuliniusDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, Clinical School of Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1322-4703

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe COVID-19 pandemic has had a significant impact on medical education, with many institutions shifting to online learning to ensure the safety of students and staff. However, there appears to be a decline in in-person attendance at medical schools across the UK and worldwide following the relaxation of social distancing rules and the reinstatement of in-person teaching. Importantly, this trend was also observed before the pandemic. While reflected within the literature, there is currently no systematic review describing these changes. We aim to find out how medical students' attendance is changing as documented within the literature and its impact on their educational outcomes.

methodsThis systematic review followed the guidelines of the Centre of Research and Dissemination, Moose and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses. We searched the major databases of Medline via Ovid, Embase via Ovid, Scopus, Web of Science, British Education Index via EBSCOhost and ERIC via EBSCOhost in September 2023. Two reviewers independently screened each paper and extracted the data, with a third reviewer for dispute resolution. All studies reporting on medical students from various universities, both graduate and undergraduate, and describing changes in attendance and/or students' educational outcomes were included. Risk of bias in individual studies was assessed using the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality tool. A narrative synthesis of the findings from all included studies was done.

results12 papers were included in the analysis. PRIMARY

aimOf the eight papers that measured attendance data over more than one academic year, only one paper demonstrated a statistically significant decrease while one paper demonstrated a statistically significant increase in attendance over the observational period. Other papers either did not perform statistical tests or did not demonstrate statistical significance. Secondary aims: Most papers showed a general positive correlation between attendance and educational outcomes. No studies explicitly explored reasons for changes in attendance seen. Only one paper outlined a possible strategy to address changes in attendance, a mandatory attendance policy, which has mixed outcomes. DISCUSSION: Despite widespread anecdotally reported attendance decline post-COVID-19, overall, there was no consistent change in attendance noted. However, there was a large heterogeneity in the studies included. Further research is required to elucidate trends in attendance and its impact on medical education.

Indexed as

COVID-19Education, DistanceEducation, MedicalEducation, Medical, UndergraduateStudents, MedicalTeachingHumansPandemicsSARS-CoV-2Schools, MedicalUnited KingdomEducation, MedicalHealth EducationMEDICAL EDUCATION & TRAININGTask Performance and Analysis

Identifiers

PMID40389321
PMCPMC12090850

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.