Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40388970›Full record

ReviewPhysical biology2025

Methods in quantitative biology-from analysis of single-cell microscopy images to inference of predictive models for stochastic gene expression.

Luis U Aguilera, Lisa M Weber, Eric Ron, Connor R King, Kaan Öcal, Alex Popinga, Joshua Cook, Michael P May, William S Raymond, Zachary R Fox and 4 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Physical biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Luis U AguileraDepartment of Chemical and Biological Engineering, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-0609-539X
Lisa M WeberDepartment of Chemical and Biological Engineering, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523, United States of America.
Eric RonSchool of Biomedical Engineering, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523, United States of America.
Connor R KingDepartment of Chemical and Biological Engineering, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523, United States of America.
Kaan ÖcalSchool of BioSciences, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria 3010, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-8528-6858
Alex PopingaDepartment of Chemical and Biological Engineering, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-0152-5728
Joshua CookSchool of Biomedical Engineering, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523, United States of America.
Michael P MaySchool of Biomedical Engineering, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523, United States of America.
William S RaymondSchool of Biomedical Engineering, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523, United States of America.
Zachary R FoxOak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN 37830, United States of America.
Linda S Forero-QuinteroDepartment of Chemical and Biological Engineering, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523, United States of America.
Jack R FormanSchool of Biomedical Engineering, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523, United States of America.
Alexandre DavidDepartment of Chemical and Biological Engineering, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523, United States of America.
Brian MunskyDepartment of Chemical and Biological Engineering, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-6147-7329

Funding

Using cellular fluctuations and computational analyses to probe biological mechanismsR35GM124747 · NIGMS · COLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI Brian Munsky · 2017 to 2026
$3.3M
National Science Foundation MCB-1941870NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM124747
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The field of quantitative biology (q-bio) seeks to provide precise and testable explanations for observed biological phenomena by applying mathematical and computational methods. The central goals of q-bio are to (1) systematically propose quantitative hypotheses in the form of mathematical models, (2) demonstrate that these models faithfully capture a specific essence of a biological process, and (3) correctly forecast the dynamics of the process in new, and previously untested circumstances. Achieving these goals depends on accurate analysis and incorporating informative experimental data to constrain the set of potential mathematical representations. In this introductory tutorial, we provide an overview of the state of the field and introduce some of the computational methods most commonly used in q-bio. In particular, we examine experimental techniques in single-cell imaging, computational tools to process images and extract quantitative data, various mechanistic modeling approaches used to reproduce these quantitative data, and techniques for data-driven model inference and model-driven experiment design. All topics are presented in the context of additional online resources, including open-source Python notebooks and open-ended practice problems that comprise the technical content of the annual Undergraduate Quantitative Biology Summer School (UQ-Bio).

Indexed as

Computational BiologyGene ExpressionMicroscopySingle-Cell AnalysisImage Processing, Computer-AssistedModels, BiologicalStochastic Processesfluorescence microscopymechanistic modelsmodel inferencequantitative biologysingle-cell imagingstochastic gene expression

Identifiers

PMID40388970
PMCPMC12150428

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.