Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40388936›Full record

ArticleScience progress

Rectal arterial embolization for hemostasis of acute hemorrhagic rectal ulcers: A case series.

Yafeng Gu, Huizhen Wu, Weiling Tian, Hailin Jiang, Liyu Huang, Hongchao Liu, Huaqiang Liao, Xiaoxi Meng, Weihua Dong

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Science progress. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Yafeng GuDepartment of Interventional Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of the Naval Medical University of the Chinese People's Liberation Army, Shanghai, China.ORCID 0000-0001-5205-2804
Huizhen WuDepartment of General Practice, Xinhua Hospital, Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.ORCID 0009-0002-4768-3518
Weiling TianDepartment of Interventional Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of the Naval Medical University of the Chinese People's Liberation Army, Shanghai, China.ORCID 0009-0004-5093-1118
Hailin JiangDepartment of Interventional Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of the Naval Medical University of the Chinese People's Liberation Army, Shanghai, China.ORCID 0000-0002-5597-8431
Liyu HuangDepartment of Interventional Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of the Naval Medical University of the Chinese People's Liberation Army, Shanghai, China.ORCID 0009-0007-5272-9345
Hongchao LiuDepartment of Interventional Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of the Naval Medical University of the Chinese People's Liberation Army, Shanghai, China.ORCID 0009-0000-5827-538X
Huaqiang LiaoDepartment of Interventional Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of the Naval Medical University of the Chinese People's Liberation Army, Shanghai, China.ORCID 0000-0001-8758-0076
Xiaoxi MengDepartment of Interventional Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of the Naval Medical University of the Chinese People's Liberation Army, Shanghai, China.ORCID 0000-0003-4359-7161
Weihua DongDepartment of Interventional Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of the Naval Medical University of the Chinese People's Liberation Army, Shanghai, China.ORCID 0000-0003-1406-8981

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Acute hemorrhagic rectal ulcer (AHRU), though a relatively rare etiology of lower gastrointestinal bleeding, represents a critical clinical emergency characterized by sudden onset, painless, massive, and fresh rectal bleeding. While endoscopic hemostasis remains prominent therapy, its efficacy is limited in emergency settings by poor bowel preparation and obscured visualization. Rectal arterial embolization (RAE) offers a viable alternative, however, detailed descriptions of its application for AHRU in literature are lacking. Thus, we report a single-center experience of RAE in six patients with massive AHRU-related bleeding. Technical success was achieved in 83% (5/6) of cases, with clinical success was achieved in 100% cases (6/6). Rebleeding after initial RAE procedure occurred in 33% (2/6) of cases, one of which ultimately achieving hemostasis through transanal suturing after initial embolization failure. No major embolism-related complications were observed during follow-up. Moreover, complete embolization of rectal supplies demonstrated potential to reduce rebleeding risk, and empiric embolization may hold promise for managing refractory AHRU hemorrhage. These findings advocate for RAE as an effective alternative for AHRU hemorrhage, though further validation in larger cohorts is essential.

Indexed as

Embolization, TherapeuticGastrointestinal HemorrhageRectal DiseasesRectumUlcerHemostasisHumansTreatment OutcomeAcute hemorrhagic rectal ulcerendoscopic therapylower gastrointestinal bleedingrebleedingrectal arterial embolization

Identifiers

PMID40388936
PMCPMC12089723

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.