Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40388636›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal of circumpolar health2025

Bone mineral content among Inuit - a systematic review of data.

Jonas Bjørn Skjøth, Therese Mygind Hagens, Inuuteq Fleischer, Mogens Laursen, Stig Andersen

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal of circumpolar health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jonas Bjørn SkjøthArctic Health Research Centre, Department of Clinical Medicine, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-6846-4085
Therese Mygind HagensArctic Health Research Centre, Department of Clinical Medicine, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark.
Inuuteq FleischerDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.
Mogens LaursenDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.
Stig AndersenArctic Health Research Centre, Department of Clinical Medicine, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Inuit are a distinct ethnic group living in an environment likely to influence calcium metabolism and skeletal health. Bone mineral content (BMC) is a marker of skeletal health and fracture risk. Age is a dominant risk factor for osteoporosis, emphasising the importance of skeletal health in the ageing Inuit populations. This systematic review aims to provide an overview of data on BMC among Inuit. We performed a systematic search for data on BMC among Inuit guided by an experienced librarian. The search identified 211 studies, of which six provided data on BMC among Inuit living in Alaska or Canada. In men/women, BMC peaked around the age of 25 years in distal radius at 1.55/1.07 g/cm2 and in distal ulna at 0.81/0.54 g/cm2. Diaphysis of ulna, humerus, and tibia peaked around 10 years later. The 23% to 30% sex differences in BMC were similar across studies. Age related changes were parallel to other populations. In conclusion, BMC in Inuit is presented for easy viewing and comparison. BMC was similar between Inuit populations, and sex and age-related differences were comparable to other populations. New scientific studies should update data, include spine and hip, describe bone structure, and consider fracture risk beyond BMC.

Indexed as

Bone DensityInuitAdultAgedAge FactorsAlaskaArctic RegionsCanadaFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedOsteoporosisRisk FactorsSex FactorsArctic peoplebone mineral contentBone mineral densityEskimosInuit

Identifiers

PMID40388636
PMCPMC12090282

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.