ArticleJournal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Global research & reviews2025
Academic Orthopaedic Surgeon Financial Compensation in the United States: Trends and Distribution.
Article in Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Global research & reviews, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- How Should Pediatric Orthopaedic Surgeons Be Paid? Compensation Models and Incentives to Motivate Surgeons in the USA: The Role of Surgeon Leaders.Journal of the Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionThe overall trends in academic orthopaedic surgery compensation are not well studied. The aim of this study was to assess trends and distribution of academic orthopaedic surgery financial compensation and consider in relation to academic rank, sex, and race/ethnicity.
methodsThe 2017 to 2023 American Association of Medical Colleges Faculty Salary Surveys were used, which collect information for full-time faculty at US medical schools. Financial compensation data for orthopaedic faculty, across subspecialities, were stratified by year, academic rank, sex, race/ethnicity, and geographic region. Trends in median, 25th, and 75th percentile compensation were assessed.
resultsResponses for 2,601 faculty members across orthopaedic departments were available, including 82 instructors, 1,176 assistant professors, 668 associate professors, 487 full professors, 104 chiefs (lead a division within the larger department), and 84 chairs (head an entire academic department). Median faculty compensation increased on an average of 1.80% to 6.93%, with the greatest increase at the chief and chair levels and smaller increases for instructors and professors of varying rank. From 2017 to 2013, women were consistently compensated less than men at all ranks except chairs. In 2023, women in academic orthopaedic surgery made less cents-on-the-dollar relative to men of equal rank across all ranks. Asian assistant professors made 0.90 cents-on-the-dollar, and Hispanic/Latino and Black/African American assistant professors made 0.87 cents-on-the-dollar compared with White faculty of equal rank. However, among professors, these groups had higher median compensation (1.06 to 1.1 cents-on-the-dollar) compared with White professors. The geographic variations of compensation were within the range of 15k for assistant professors, 32k for associate professors, 196k for chiefs, 95k for professors, and 83k for chairs.
conclusionThis study summarizes trends of academic orthopaedic faculty compensation and shows salaries barely keeping pace with inflation and persistent compensation inequities, which highlights the need for fair, transparent compensation models and additional studies of factors impacting physician compensation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.