Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40388472›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Pseudomonas aeruginosa bloodstream infections in internal medicine wards: A large Italian multicenter retrospective study.

Silvia Corcione, Simone Mornese Pinna, Antonio Vena, Michela Schenone, Maura Sanino, Renato Pascale, Emanuele Pivetta, Daniele Roberto Giacobbe, Maddalena Giannella, Nour Shbaklo and 13 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Predictors of Mortality inPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors.

Silvia CorcioneDepartment of Medical Sciences, Infectious Diseases, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
Simone Mornese PinnaDepartment of Medical Sciences, Infectious Diseases, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
Antonio VenaDepartment of Health Sciences (DISSAL), University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy.
Michela SchenoneDepartment of Health Sciences (DISSAL), University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy.
Maura SaninoDepartment of Medical Sciences, Internal Medicine, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
Renato PascaleInfectious Diseases Unit, IRCCS-Sant'Orsola Polyclinic, Bologna, Italy.
Emanuele PivettaDepartment of Medical Sciences, Internal Medicine, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
Daniele Roberto GiacobbeDepartment of Health Sciences (DISSAL), University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy.
Maddalena GiannellaInfectious Diseases Unit, IRCCS-Sant'Orsola Polyclinic, Bologna, Italy.
Nour ShbakloDepartment of Medical Sciences, Infectious Diseases, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0171-9274
Francesca GiovannenzeDepartment of Laboratory and Infectious Sciences, IRCCS A. Gemelli University polyclinic Foundation, Rome, Italy.
Nicholas GeremiaUnit of Infectious Diseases, Department of Clinical Medicine, Dell'Angelo Hospital, Venice, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7988-5419
Malgorzata MikulskaDepartment of Health Sciences (DISSAL), University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy.
Davide BavaroDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy.
Eleonora TaddeiDepartment of Laboratory and Infectious Sciences, IRCCS A. Gemelli University polyclinic Foundation, Rome, Italy.
Vincenzo ScaglioneInfectious and Tropical Diseases Unit, Padua University Hospital, Padua, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2911-2255
Veronica VassiaInfectious and Tropical Disease Unit, Mauriziano Umberto I Hospital, Turin, Italy.
Benedetta FumarolaInfectious Disesases, Ospedali Civili, Brescia, Italy.
Michele BartolettiDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy.
Pierluigi VialeInfectious Diseases Unit, IRCCS-Sant'Orsola Polyclinic, Bologna, Italy.
Matteo BassettiDepartment of Health Sciences (DISSAL), University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy.
Francesco Giuseppe De RosaDepartment of Medical Sciences, Infectious Diseases, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
SITA GIOVANI (Young Investigators Group of the Società Italiana Terapia Antinfettiva)

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThis large, multicenter, Italian retrospective study aimed to describe clinical characteristics and risk factors associated with 30-day mortality in patients with Pseudomonas aeruginosa bloodstream infections (PA-BSI) admitted to internal medicine wards (IMW). To enhance clinical decision-making, we also developed and internally validated a bedside prognostic model to predict the 30-day mortality risk.

methodsWe conducted a retrospective, multicenter cohort study across 14 public hospitals in Italy, analyzing all adult patients admitted to IMW with PA-BSI between 2021 and 2022.

resultsOut of 285 eligible patients with PA-BSI, the median age was 73 years, and septic shock occurred in 13.3% of cases. Less than 5% of PA-BSI were caused by difficult-to-treat resistant P. aeruginosa (DTR-PA). Encouragingly, appropriate empiric therapy was administered in 69.8% of patients, yet the overall 30-day mortality remained 22.5%. Cox regression analysis identified age, and urinary catheter use as significant risk factors for mortality. Conversely, adequate source control and targeted therapy emerged as protective factors. Multivariate analysis confirmed septic shock at bloodstream infection onset (HR 6.96; 95% CI, 1.72-28.12) as a strong independent predictor of mortality, whereas effective source control (HR 0.152; 95% CI, 0.039-0.59) significantly improved survival odds. Using these insights, we developed a practical prognostic model capable of estimating the 30-day mortality risk, providing clinicians with a valuable predictive tool at the bedside.

conclusionsPA-BSI in IMWs is characterized by a relatively low incidence of septic shock and rate of resistance, alongside high rates of appropriate empiric therapy. Despite these favorable factors, meropenem may represent a valuable therapeutic option for PA-BSI with severe presentations in this setting since mortality remains substantial (22.5%). Our findings underscore the critical importance of early source control and identify septic shock as a key predictor of mortality even in the setting of IMW. The proposed bedside nomogram model could empower clinicians to identify high-risk patients early, facilitating timely interventions and improving outcomes in this vulnerable population.

Indexed as

BacteremiaPseudomonas aeruginosaPseudomonas InfectionsAgedAged, 80 and overAnti-Bacterial AgentsFemaleHumansInternal MedicineItalyMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsShock, SepticAnti-Bacterial Agents

Identifiers

PMID40388472
PMCPMC12088033

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.