ArticlePloS one2025
Longitudinal assessment of COVID-19 vaccine immunogenicity in people with HIV stratified by CD4+ T-cell count in the Netherlands: A two-year follow-up study.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAlthough guidelines for COVID-19 additional vaccination strategies generally prioritise people with advanced HIV infection, recommendations vary globally, with some countries recommending an annual vaccination for all people with HIV (PWH), while others restrict this to PWH with a CD4+ T-cell count < 200 cells per µL.
methodsWe conducted a prospective cohort study in 448 adult PWH. The primary outcome was the SARS-CoV-2 spike (S1)-specific IgG antibody level at 1, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months after completing a primary COVID-19 vaccination series (two doses of BNT162b2, mRNA-1273, or ChAdOx1-S, or one dose of Ad26.COV2.S). We compared the antibody kinetics over two years between PWH with a baseline CD4+ T-cell count < 200 cells per µL (n = 16) vs. ≥ 200 cells per µL (n = 432) with a mixed-effects model. Secondary outcomes included variables associated with the kinetics of S1-specific antibody levels and the incidence of breakthrough infections.
resultsThe median most recent CD4+ T-cell count prior to primary vaccination was 140 (IQR 80-165) in the < 200 cells per µL group, and 688 (IQR 520-899) in the ≥ 200 cells per µL group at the time of primary vaccination. S1-specific antibodies were lower in PWH with a CD4+ T-cell count < 200 vs. ≥ 200 cells per µL during the two-year follow-up, with predicted S1-specific antibody levels of 514 (95% CI 456-578) vs. 2758 (95% CI 1488-5110) BAU per mL at 12 months (p < 0.001) and 839 (95% CI 732-959) vs. 3505 (95% CI 1712-7175) BAU per mL at 24 months (p < 0.001). The overall incidence of SARS-CoV-2 infections was 55% and comparable between groups. A CD4+ T-cell count < 200 cells per µL, higher age, and a vector-based primary vaccination series were negatively associated with S1-specific antibody levels over time.
conclusionLong-term humoral responses were lower in PWH with a CD4+ T-cell count < 200 cells per µL compared to those with a CD4+ T-cell count ≥ 200 cells per µL. National COVID-19 vaccine guidelines recommending booster vaccines for all PWH, should therefore specifically emphasise the need for booster vaccines in those with a CD4+ T-cell count < 200 cells per µL. Trial registration: The trial was registered on the International Clinical Trials Platform (registration number: EUCTR2021-001054-57-N).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.