ArticlePloS one2025
Enhanced voice recognition in musicians.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Musicians typically have extensive auditory experience and demonstrate better pitch, timbre, and tempo discrimination compared to non-musicians. Musical training is also correlated with earlier and more robust cortical and subcortical responses to linguistic stimuli. We asked whether musical expertise may contribute to other auditory tasks, namely person and object recognition when both auditory and visual cues to identity are available. Musicians and non-musicians learned face-voice and car-horn "identity" pairs. Using a forced choice, old/new paradigm, participants were tested for recognition of the learned stimuli presented among distractor stimuli under three stimulus conditions (auditory only, visual only, and bimodal audiovisual). Compared to non-musicians, musicians were more sensitive at recognizing voices but not object sounds. Further, voice recognition sensitivity was positively correlated with both years of musical training and hours of weekly practice suggesting an influence of experience on performance. This differential performance for people and object stimuli is consistent with distinct neural substrates for face and object processing. Overall, this study demonstrates that experience in a sensory domain can benefit aspects of that sensory ability, such as voice but not object sound recognition, likely due to plasticity in distinct neural processing pathways.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.