Trial reportPloS one2025
Outcomes and experiences of DIALOG+ provided remotely for patients with anxiety disorders-A non-controlled pilot trial.
Trial report in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLow-cost interventions in routine care are needed to reduce the burden of anxiety disorders. DIALOG+ is an evidence-based intervention specifically designed to make routine patient-clinician meetings in mental health care therapeutically effective. It has been shown to be beneficial in a range of studies, but so far not been tested in patients with a primary diagnosis of anxiety disorders.
methodsWe conducted a non-controlled pilot trial in an out-patient service in Buenos Aires, Argentina. DIALOG+ was applied five times over a six-month period. Because of the pandemic all sessions had to be delivered remotely which had not been originally planned. At baseline and after the intervention, we assessed as outcome criteria subjective quality of life on the Manchester Short Assessment of Quality of Life, general symptoms on the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale and the objective social situation on the Social Outcomes Index. Patient experiences were explored in semi-structured interviews.
resultsForty patients completed the study. All outcome criteria, quality of life (4.1±0.5 to 5.0±0.5; p<0.001), general symptoms (33.0±9.3 to 25.9±7.6; p<0.001) and the objective social situation (5.2±0.9 to 5.6±0.5; p=0.008) showed significant improvements. Patient reported largely positive experiences despite frequent technical problems with the online arrangements.
conclusionsThe findings suggest that DIALOG+ is feasible and beneficial for patients with anxiety disorders in routine care and that a remote delivery is a feasible realistic option for administering it. Future research should assess implementation methods and effectiveness in larger controlled trials and identify the effective mechanisms in DIALOG+.
trial registrationThe trial was pre-registered (https://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN38851969) on 16/12/2019.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.