SynthesisPloS one2025
The effectiveness of pulsed electromagnetic field therapy in patients with shoulder impingement syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Synthesis in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Association Between Postoperative Subacromial Impingement Syndrome and Functional Recovery After Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair in Elderly Patients: A Single-Center Retrospective Study.Clinical interventions in aging · 2026Article
- Active vs. sham pulsed electromagnetic field therapy added to standardized conservative care for partial-thickness supraspinatus tears: study protocol for a randomized, assessor-blinded, sham-controlled trial.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2026Article
- The effects of pulsed electromagnetic field therapy on pain and physical functions in patients with soft tissue injuries: a systematic review of randomised controlled trials.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2026Review
- Most Common Injuries in Resistance Training: Mechanisms, Therapeutic Interventions, and Preventive Strategies.Cureus · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the efficacy of pulsed electromagnetic field (PEMF) therapy in treating patients with shoulder impingement syndrome. We sourced data from PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and Embase databases up until June 19, 2024. Our analysis included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that evaluated the impact of PEMF therapy on pain levels and functional capacity in these patients. In total, four RCTs involving 252 participants were included. The pooled data indicated that PEMF therapy significantly reduced short-term pain (standardized mean difference [SMD] = -0.34, 95% confidence interval [CI] = -0.66 to -0.01, three RCTs, n = 166) and improved both short-term (SMD = 0.4, 95% CI = 0.08 to 0.73, three RCTs, n = 166) and long-term functional capacity (SMD = 0.6, 95% CI = 0.33 to 0.88, three RCTs, n = 212). The aforementioned results all achieved clinical significance. The observed low heterogeneity for short-term pain, along with short term and long-term functional capacity, highlights the sustained robustness and consistency of the effect on functional capacity over time. These results suggest that PEMF therapy is statistically effective in enhancing short-term pain relief and improving both short-term and long-term functional capacity in patients with shoulder impingement syndrome, with clinically significant benefits. However, the study limitations include a small sample size and variability in PEMF protocols, highlighting the necessity for standardized methodologies in future research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.