ArticleJournal of chemical information and modeling2025
Investigating the Nature of PRM:SH3 Interactions Using Artificial Intelligence and Molecular Dynamics.
Article in Journal of chemical information and modeling, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Understanding the binding interactions within protein-peptide complexes is crucial for elucidating key physicochemical phenomena in biological systems. Among the outcomes of these interactions, biomolecular condensates have recently emerged as vital players in various cellular functions including signaling. Complexes such as PRM:SH3 are known to undergo condensation, yet the chemical interactions and governing factors driving these behaviors remain poorly understood. In this study, we combine AlphaFold2 and molecular dynamics simulations to investigate the binding nature of PRM:SH3. Our findings reveal that proline-to-alanine mutations enhance flexibility, weakening the binding affinity, while charge-altering mutations modify the binding mode and influence the binding strength. Notably, the PRM(H) series shows that binding is primarily driven by local flexibility and the hydrophobic effect. Furthermore, we demonstrate that the root-mean-square deviation and dendrogram height are correlated to experimental dissociation constants. These insights provide a framework for understanding the binding behaviors of protein-peptide complexes and offer an effective approach for studying similar systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.