Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40388411›Full record

ArticleJournal of chemical information and modeling2025

Investigating the Nature of PRM:SH3 Interactions Using Artificial Intelligence and Molecular Dynamics.

Se-Jun Kim, Da-Eun Hwang, Hyungjun Kim, Jeong-Mo Choi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of chemical information and modeling, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Se-Jun KimDepartment of Chemistry, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST), Daejeon 34141, Republic of Korea.
Da-Eun HwangDepartment of Chemistry and Chemistry Institute for Functional Materials, Pusan National University, Busan 46241, Republic of Korea.
Hyungjun KimDepartment of Chemistry, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST), Daejeon 34141, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-8261-9381
Jeong-Mo ChoiDepartment of Chemistry and Chemistry Institute for Functional Materials, Pusan National University, Busan 46241, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-2656-4851

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding the binding interactions within protein-peptide complexes is crucial for elucidating key physicochemical phenomena in biological systems. Among the outcomes of these interactions, biomolecular condensates have recently emerged as vital players in various cellular functions including signaling. Complexes such as PRM:SH3 are known to undergo condensation, yet the chemical interactions and governing factors driving these behaviors remain poorly understood. In this study, we combine AlphaFold2 and molecular dynamics simulations to investigate the binding nature of PRM:SH3. Our findings reveal that proline-to-alanine mutations enhance flexibility, weakening the binding affinity, while charge-altering mutations modify the binding mode and influence the binding strength. Notably, the PRM(H) series shows that binding is primarily driven by local flexibility and the hydrophobic effect. Furthermore, we demonstrate that the root-mean-square deviation and dendrogram height are correlated to experimental dissociation constants. These insights provide a framework for understanding the binding behaviors of protein-peptide complexes and offer an effective approach for studying similar systems.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceMolecular Dynamics Simulationsrc Homology DomainsHydrophobic and Hydrophilic InteractionsMutationPeptidesProtein BindingPeptides

Identifiers

PMID40388411
PMCPMC12152953

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.