ArticlePloS one2025
Can ultrasound parameters predict the diagnostic yield of diuretic renal scintigraphy in pediatric hydronephrosis?
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Diuretic renal scintigraphy (DRS) is a valuable imaging tool for distinguishing obstructive from non-obstructive hydronephrosis, especially in pediatric patients, but non-diagnostic results are not uncommon. In this retrospective analytical study, we examined if kidney ultrasound (US) parameters can predict non-diagnostic DRS, and DRS with an obstruction pattern, potentially guiding patient selection to reduce unnecessary radiation exposure. The study included 67 patients (134 kidneys), 1-month to 4-years of age who underwent both DRS and US. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis of US parameters including parenchymal thickness, cortical thickness, medullary pyramidal thickness, anterior-posterior renal pelvic diameter, was done to assess the predictiveness of these parameters for prediction of DRS results. None of the US parameters reliably predicted non-diagnostic DRS results (AUC range: 0.41-0.61). However, these parameters demonstrated good predictiveness for identifying DRS with an obstruction pattern (AUC range: 0.69-0.87), with anterior-posterior renal pelvic diameter showing the highest performance. These findings suggest that while US parameters cannot predict non-diagnostic DRS outcomes, they are effective in identifying obstruction patterns on DRS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.