Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40388324›Full record

ArticleeLife2025

A memory model of rodent spatial navigation in which place cells are memories arranged in a grid and grid cells are non-spatial.

David E Huber

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

David E HuberDepartment of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7709-7993

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A theory and neurocomputational model are presented that explain grid cell responses as the byproduct of equally dissimilar hippocampal memories. On this account, place and grid cells are best understood as the natural consequence of memory encoding and retrieval; a precise hexagonal grid is the exception rather than the rule, emerging when the animal explores a large surface that is devoid of landmarks and objects. In the proposed memory model, place cells represent memories that are conjunctions of both spatial and non-spatial attributes, and grid cells primarily represent the non-spatial attributes (e.g. sounds, surface texture, etc.) found throughout the two-dimensional recording enclosure. Place cells support memories of the locations where non-spatial attributes can be found (e.g. positions with a particular sound), which are arranged in a hexagonal lattice owing to memory encoding and consolidation processes (pattern separation) as applied to situations in which the non-spatial attributes are found at all locations of a two-dimensional surface. Grid cells exhibit their spatial firing pattern owing to feedback from hippocampal place cells (i.e. a hexagonal pattern of remembered locations for the non-spatial attribute represented by a grid cell). Model simulations explain a wide variety of results in the rodent spatial navigation literature.

Indexed as

Grid CellsMemoryModels, NeurologicalPlace CellsSpatial NavigationAnimalsComputer SimulationHippocampusRatsRodentiacomputer simulationConsolidationgrid cellshumanMemorymouseneuroscienceplace cellsratspatial navigation

Identifiers

PMID40388324
PMCPMC12088679

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.