ArticleIntegrative and comparative biology2025
The Effect of Venipuncture Site on Hematology of Bats: Implications for Comparative Analyses.
Article in Integrative and comparative biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Emergence from torpor rapidly elevates suppressed blood immune parameters in a bat species hibernating in a moderate climate.The Journal of experimental biology · 2026Article
- Adapting flow cytometry for studying immune cell seasonality in wild migratory bats.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Wildlife health comparisons within and across populations and species are essential for population assessment and surveillance of emerging infectious diseases. Due to low costs and high informational yield, hematology is commonly used in the fields of ecoimmunology and disease ecology, yet consistency and proper reporting of methods within these fields are lacking. Previous investigations on various wildlife taxa have revealed noteworthy impacts of the vein used for blood collection on hematology measures. However, the impacts of venipuncture site on bats, a taxon of increasing interest in ecoimmunology and disease ecology, have not yet been tested. Here, we use a long-term study system in western Oklahoma to test the effect of venipuncture site on hematology parameters of the Mexican free-tailed bat (Tadarida brasiliensis) and cave myotis (Myotis velifer), two abundant and representative bat species from the families Molossidae and Vespertilionidae. Between September 2023 and October 2024, we collected paired peripheral blood from both the propatagial and intrafemoral veins in 25 individuals per species. We then quantified total red and white blood cells, reticulocyte counts, and leukocyte differentials and used generalized linear mixed models to compare parameters among venipuncture sites within and between bat species. Overall, venipuncture site had no effect on any hematology parameters; however, we revealed small differences in neutrophil and lymphocyte proportions between veins among the species. By contrast, we detected significant species-level differences in most cell measurements, which we propose could be explained by life-history strategy and phylogenetic differences. We encourage continued testing of additional venipuncture sites, and of the same venipuncture sites on different species, on hematology and other health metrics used in ecoimmunology and disease ecology. Lastly, we emphasize the importance of thorough method reporting in publications to enable transparent comparisons and accounting for even small sampling-based artifacts. All future efforts are especially important for bats to improve conservation monitoring, ecosystem services estimations, and their association with emerging infectious diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.