ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2025
Beacon Reconstruction Attack: Reconstruction of genomes in genomic data-sharing beacons using summary statistics.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- WiNGS-API: a federated genome/phenome data sharing platform enabling gene discovery and variant classification for rare diseases.Genome medicine · 2026Article
- Rethinking scale in AI-driven genomic medicine - The role of small biobanks.Frontiers in genetics · 2026Article
- Federated, governed, and interoperable? The emerging architecture of public human genomic data infrastructures: a European perspective.Frontiers in genetics · 2026Review
- A reinforcement learning-based approach for dynamic privacy protection in genomic data sharing beacons.Genome biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
motivationGenomic data-sharing beacon protocol, developed by the Global Alliance for Genomics and Health, offers a privacy-preserving mechanism for querying genomic datasets while restricting direct data access. Despite their design, beacons remain vulnerable to privacy attacks. This study introduces a novel privacy vulnerability of the protocol: one can reconstruct large portions of the genomes of all beacon participants by only using the summary statistics reported by the protocol.
resultsWe introduce a novel optimization-based algorithm that leverages beacon responses and SNP correlations for reconstruction. By optimizing for the SNP correlations and allele frequencies, the proposed approach achieves genome reconstruction with a substantially higher F1-score (70%) compared to baseline methods (45%) on beacons generated using individuals from the HapMap and OpenSNP datasets. We show that reconstructed genomes can be used by downstream applications such as in membership inference attacks against other beacons. Our findings reveal that beacons releasing allele frequencies substantially increase the reconstruction risk, underscoring the need for enhanced privacy-preserving mechanisms to protect genomic data. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: Our implementation is available at https://github.com/ASAP-Bilkent/Beacon-Reconstruction-Attack.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.