Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40388204›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2025

Beacon Reconstruction Attack: Reconstruction of genomes in genomic data-sharing beacons using summary statistics.

Kousar Saleem, A Ercument Cicek, Sinem Sav

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Kousar SaleemComputer Engineering Department, Bilkent University, Üniversiteler Mahallesi, Ankara, 06800, Türkiye.
A Ercument CicekComputer Engineering Department, Bilkent University, Üniversiteler Mahallesi, Ankara, 06800, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0001-8613-6619
Sinem SavComputer Engineering Department, Bilkent University, Üniversiteler Mahallesi, Ankara, 06800, Türkiye.

Funding

Privacy Challenges of Genomic Data-Sharing Beacons and SolutionsR01LM013429 · NLM · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI AYDAY, ERMAN · 2020 to 2023
$1.2M
NIH HHS R01LM013429NLM NIH HHS R01 LM013429
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

motivationGenomic data-sharing beacon protocol, developed by the Global Alliance for Genomics and Health, offers a privacy-preserving mechanism for querying genomic datasets while restricting direct data access. Despite their design, beacons remain vulnerable to privacy attacks. This study introduces a novel privacy vulnerability of the protocol: one can reconstruct large portions of the genomes of all beacon participants by only using the summary statistics reported by the protocol.

resultsWe introduce a novel optimization-based algorithm that leverages beacon responses and SNP correlations for reconstruction. By optimizing for the SNP correlations and allele frequencies, the proposed approach achieves genome reconstruction with a substantially higher F1-score (70%) compared to baseline methods (45%) on beacons generated using individuals from the HapMap and OpenSNP datasets. We show that reconstructed genomes can be used by downstream applications such as in membership inference attacks against other beacons. Our findings reveal that beacons releasing allele frequencies substantially increase the reconstruction risk, underscoring the need for enhanced privacy-preserving mechanisms to protect genomic data. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: Our implementation is available at https://github.com/ASAP-Bilkent/Beacon-Reconstruction-Attack.

Indexed as

Computer SecurityGenomicsInformation DisseminationAlgorithmsDatabases, GeneticGene FrequencyHumansPolymorphism, Single Nucleotide

Identifiers

PMID40388204
PMCPMC12133290

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.