Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40388163›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2025

Antibiotic Treatment in Patients Hospitalized for Nonsevere COVID-19.

Michael S Pulia, Meggie Griffin, Rebecca Schwei, Aurora Pop-Vicas, Lucas T Schulz, Meng-Shiou Shieh, Penelope Pekow, Valerie M Vaughn, Peter K Lindenauer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Michael S PuliaBerbeeWalsh Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Wisconsin-Madison School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison.
Meggie GriffinBerbeeWalsh Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Wisconsin-Madison School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison.
Rebecca SchweiBerbeeWalsh Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Wisconsin-Madison School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison.
Aurora Pop-VicasDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin-Madison School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison.
Lucas T SchulzSchool of Pharmacy, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison.
Meng-Shiou ShiehDepartment Healthcare Delivery and Population Sciences, University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School-Baystate, Springfield.
Penelope PekowDepartment Healthcare Delivery and Population Sciences, University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School-Baystate, Springfield.
Valerie M VaughnDivision of General Internal Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City.
Peter K LindenauerDepartment Healthcare Delivery and Population Sciences, University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School-Baystate, Springfield.

Funding

AHRQ HHS R01 HS028669
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Patients hospitalized with nonsevere COVID-19 continue to receive community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) antibiotic treatment despite a low risk of bacterial coinfection. Unnecessary antibiotic prescribing contributes to global antibiotic resistance and also poses a threat to individual patients. Objective: To examine the association of CAP antibiotic treatment started on admission with clinical outcomes among a large sample of patients hospitalized for nonsevere COVID-19 in hospitals across the US. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective cohort study used a target trial emulation design. Participants were adult, immunocompetent patients admitted to general care for COVID-19 from April 2020 to December 2023 at 1053 US-based acute-care hospitals that contribute data to the Premier Healthcare Database. Patients with nonpneumonia bacterial infections present on admission were excluded. Data were analyzed from April to October 2024. Exposure: Receipt of a CAP antibiotic regimen on the day of admission. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was a composite measure of deterioration (vasopressor, high-flow oxygen, noninvasive ventilation, invasive mechanical ventilation, intermediate care, intensive care unit admission) and in-hospital mortality occurring on day 2 or later. The association between receipt of antibiotic therapy and the primary outcome was assessed using propensity methods while adjusting for a broad set of potential confounders, including cotreatments. Results: The cohort included 520 405 patients with COVID-19 (median [IQR] age, 66 [53-78] years; 266 186 [51.2%] male), including 92 708 Black patients (17.8%), 63 619 Hispanic patients (12.2%), and 304 649 White patients (58.5%); 279 656 patients (53.7%) had Medicare insurance. A total of 160 482 patients (30.8%) were treated with a CAP antibiotic regimen on day 1 of admission. The primary composite outcome was higher in the CAP group (20.8%) compared with the unexposed (no antibiotic) group (18.4%), but the difference did not meet the predefined criteria for clinical significance (ASD, 4.1%). Patients who received CAP antibiotics had higher odds of poor clinical outcomes (propensity matched-odds ratio [OR], 1.03 [95% CI, 1.01-1.05]; P = .003; inverse probability treatment weighted-OR, 1.03 [95% CI, 1.02-1.05]; P < .001; standardized mortality ratio weighted-OR, 1.10 [95% CI, 1.08-1.12]; P < .001). Conclusions and Relevance: In this large cohort study of patients hospitalized with nonsevere COVID-19, there was no clinically meaningful difference in outcomes with early antibiotic treatment. Given the risks associated with unnecessary antibiotic treatment, these results argue against routine antibiotic use in this population.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsCommunity-Acquired InfectionsCOVID-19AgedFemaleHospitalizationHospital MortalityHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesSARS-CoV-2United StatesAnti-Bacterial Agents

Identifiers

PMID40388163
PMCPMC12090033

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.