ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2025
HABiC: an algorithm based on the exact computation of the Kantorovich-Rubinstein optimizer for binary classification in transcriptomics.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
motivationMachine learning analyses of molecular omics datasets largely drive the development of precision medicine in oncology, but mathematical challenges still hamper their application in the clinic. In particular, omics-based learning relies on high dimensional data with high degrees of freedom and multicollinearity issues, requiring more tailored algorithms. Here, we have developed a prediction algorithm that relies on the 1-Wasserstein distance to better capture complex relationships between variables, and that is built on a decision rule based on the exact computation of the Kantorovich-Rubinstein optimizer to increase the algorithm precision. We explored dimension reduction and aggregation methods to improve its robustness. The exact method was compared with a neural network-based approximate method, as well as with standard Euclidean distance-based classifiers.
resultsExperimental results on synthetic datasets with multiple scenarios of redundant/informative variables revealed that exact and approximate methods based on Wasserstein distance outperformed state-of-the-art algorithms when class information was spread across a large number of variables. When predicting clinical or biological outcomes from transcriptomics datasets, HABiC achieved consistently higher accuracy in most situations. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: Python code for the HABiC classifier is available at https://github.com/chiaraco/HABiC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.