Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40388091›Full record

ArticleAdvances in therapy2025

Progressive Pulmonary Fibrosis: Current Status in Terminology and Future Directions.

Yasuhiro Kondoh, Yoshikazu Inoue

Abstract readEditorial
In one paragraph

Article in Advances in therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Yasuhiro KondohDepartment of Respiratory Medicine and Allergology, Aichi Medical University, 1-1 Yazakokarimata, Nagakute, Aichi, 480-1195, Japan. yshr.kondoh@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7456-5459
Yoshikazu InoueOsaka Anti-Tuberculosis Association, Osaka Fukujuji Hospital, Osaka, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The latest clinical practice guidelines for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) and progressive pulmonary fibrosis (PPF) were jointly published by the American Thoracic Society (ATS), European Respiratory Society (ERS), Japanese Respiratory Society (JRS), and Asociacion Latinoamericana de Thorax (ALAT) in 2022, and a new term-"PPF"-has been proposed to describe patients with non-IPF fibrosing interstitial lung diseases (ILDs), with defined criteria. However, the proposal of this new term has caused confusion amongst experts at a time when use of the term "progressive fibrosing interstitial lung disease" (PF-ILD), proposed in the phase 3 INBUILD trial of nintedanib, has become widely adopted by pulmonologists and rheumatologists in clinical practice. In this commentary, we discuss the background and concepts underpinning the terms PPF and PF-ILD and seek to provide pulmonologists and rheumatologists with a deeper understanding of the concept of PPF.

Indexed as

Idiopathic Pulmonary FibrosisLung Diseases, InterstitialPulmonary FibrosisTerminology as TopicDisease ProgressionHumansIndolesPractice Guidelines as TopicIndolesnintedanibATS/ERS/JRS/ALAT clinical practice guidelinesClinical practice guidelinesINBUILDProgressive fibrosing interstitial lung diseaseProgressive pulmonary fibrosisTerminology

Identifiers

PMID40388091
PMCPMC12182512

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.