ArticleAdvances in therapy2025
Progressive Pulmonary Fibrosis: Current Status in Terminology and Future Directions.
Article in Advances in therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Quantification and Analysis of Lung Involvement by Artificial Intelligence in Patients with Progressive Pulmonary Fibrosis Treated with Nintedanib.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Article
- The role of epigenetics in pulmonary fibrosis: recent advances in mechanistic insights and therapeutic implications.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2025Review
- Advances in clinical research on interstitial lung disease.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The latest clinical practice guidelines for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) and progressive pulmonary fibrosis (PPF) were jointly published by the American Thoracic Society (ATS), European Respiratory Society (ERS), Japanese Respiratory Society (JRS), and Asociacion Latinoamericana de Thorax (ALAT) in 2022, and a new term-"PPF"-has been proposed to describe patients with non-IPF fibrosing interstitial lung diseases (ILDs), with defined criteria. However, the proposal of this new term has caused confusion amongst experts at a time when use of the term "progressive fibrosing interstitial lung disease" (PF-ILD), proposed in the phase 3 INBUILD trial of nintedanib, has become widely adopted by pulmonologists and rheumatologists in clinical practice. In this commentary, we discuss the background and concepts underpinning the terms PPF and PF-ILD and seek to provide pulmonologists and rheumatologists with a deeper understanding of the concept of PPF.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.