ArticleDermatology and therapy2025
Treatment Status for Generalized Pustular Psoriasis in Japanese Patients: A Retrospective Chart Review.
Article in Dermatology and therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionGeneralized pustular psoriasis (GPP) is a rare, severe, and chronic inflammatory skin disease characterized by widespread pustules that leads to unpredictable and potentially serious disease flares. Information regarding treatment status for GPP and treatment patterns for flares is important but limited as a result of the rarity of the condition. We conducted a 10-year, retrospective, longitudinal chart review of treatment patterns at GPP referral hospitals in Japan.
methodsEligible patients with GPP had at least 6 months of continuous observation data within 10 years after the date of protocol approval. Data were collected from patient records and annual patient reports. Patient characteristics and treatment details, including in relation to flare occurrence, were analyzed.
resultsThe median age of patients (N = 205) was 53 years; 48.3% were female and most had mild or moderate GPP (66.8%). Patients commonly received nonbiologic systemic therapy (86.3%) and a similar proportion received biologics (79.5%); 95.1% received topical treatment and 22.4% received systemic adrenal corticosteroids. Use of nonbiologic systemic therapy decreased, and use of biologics increased, over the study period. During the observation period, the proportion of patients receiving biologic therapy increased after a flare (from 41.4% receiving biologics when flares occurred to 62.9% initiating a new biologic post flare).
conclusionIn Japanese clinical practice, the evolution of treatment practices for GPP has seen an increased use of biologic therapies over time. Biologic use was common after flares; however, some flares occurred during biologic therapy, indicating a need for improved treatment options to maintain stable disease and prevent flares.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.