ArticleAIDS and behavior2025
Epidemiologic and Economic Impacts of Halting National HIV Prevention Efforts.
Article in AIDS and behavior, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- HIV prevention service disruption among transgender adults in the context of 2025 federal executive orders in the United States: a cross-sectional multi-state study.Lancet regional health. Americas · 2026Article
- The Critical Role of Community-Based National HIV Behavioral Surveillance in the United States' Response to HIV.AIDS and behavior · 2026Article
- Projected Increases in Older People With HIV in the United States Through 2040.Open forum infectious diseases · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
News outlets are reporting that CDC's HIV prevention program including its Ending the HIV Epidemic (EHE) efforts are slated to be defunded. One way to estimate the potential impacts of halting HIV prevention in the nation is to use mathematical modeling to provide informed estimates of the epidemiologic and economic impacts of this purported policy shift. We describe here a basic transmission rate model to estimate the HIV-related epidemiologic and economic horizon through 2030 as if funding were untouched and as if it were to be ended. This model is compared to other lenses through which to view the halting of national HIV prevention. Through any employed analytic lens, the result seems similar - ending HIV prevention efforts means the epidemic will get worse, lives will be lost, and not only will money not be saved but the net additional medical costs will rapidly increase. If this worsening of the epidemic comes to pass, the nation will enter the next decade far worse off than it is now, and efforts to get back to the current HIV-related "starting place" will need to be larger, more intensive, and much more expensive. There was a national hope that the ending of the current decade would indeed be the end of the epidemic; but if HIV prevention support is stopped, we would not be able to experience this important and joyous HIV elimination milestone in 2030 but rather be left to witness just how much worse the epidemic may get.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40388056What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.