Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40388043›Full record

ReviewStem cell reviews and reports2025

Latest Advanced Techniques for Improving Intestinal Organoids Limitations.

Lisa Tonini, Changhwan Ahn

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Stem cell reviews and reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Lisa ToniniLaboratory of Veterinary Physiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Jeju National University, Jeju, 63243, Republic of Korea.
Changhwan AhnLaboratory of Veterinary Physiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Jeju National University, Jeju, 63243, Republic of Korea. cahn@jejunu.ac.kr.ORCID 0000-0002-7176-7108

Funding

National Research Foundation of Korea RS-2022-NR074155
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intestinal organoids are valuable tools across different disciplines, from a clinical aspect to the biomedical research, providing a unique perspective on the complexity of the gastrointestinal system. They are alternatives to common cell lines as they can offer insights into architectural functionality and reduce the use of animal models. A deeper understanding of their organoid characteristics is required to harness their full potential. Despite their beneficial uses and multiple advantages, organoids have limitations that remain unaddressed. This review aims to elucidate the principal limitations of intestinal organoids, investigate structural defects such as the deficiency in a vascularized and lymphatic system, and absence of the microbiome, restrictions in mimicking the physiological gut model, including the lack of an acid-neutralizing system or a shortage of digestive enzymes, and the difficulties in their long-term maintenance and polarity accessibility. Development of innovative techniques to address these limitations will lead to improve in vivo recapitulation and pioneering further advancements in this field.

Indexed as

IntestinesOrganoidsAnimalsHumansAdvanced StrategiesIntestinal OrganoidsLimitations and ChallengesOptimization

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.