ArticleMolecular biology reports2025
Comparative analysis of rooting abilities between cuttings of trifoliate orange and Micro-Tom tomato: hormonal and molecular insights into adventitious root formation.
Article in Molecular biology reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Duet between sugars and hormones: The molecular dialogue fine-tuning hypoxia acclimation in plants.Journal of integrative plant biology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe trifoliate orange is used as rootstock in the Citrus genus; nevertheless, propagation from cuttings is challenging due to low rooting ability. The underlying mechanism for low rooting ability is still unclear. This study aims to investigate hormonal biosynthesis and signaling cascades during Adventitious Root (AR) formation. METHODS AND
resultsWe systematically compared trifoliate orange and Micro-Tom tomato cuttings grown in water. The results indicated Micro-Tom tomato cuttings produced ARs within 3 days, whereas trifoliate orange developed ARs at 21 days after cuttings (DAC). The key endogenous hormones contents: indole-3-acetic acid (IAA), Jasmonic acid (JA), and salicylic acid (SA), were significantly lower in trifoliate orange than Micro-Tom tomato cuttings at earlier stages 1, 2, and 3 DAC. Moreover, IAA-related and ethylene biosynthesis genes demonstrated differential expression patterns during different developmental stages between trifoliate orange and Micro-Tom tomato. Specially, the expression levels of auxin biosynthesis genes (YUCCA6/4, GH3.3/3.6) and response factor (ARF8) were significantly elevated in Micro-Tom tomato cuttings, while lower in trifoliate orange cuttings at the earliest stages. Additionally, transcripts related to auxin signaling and transport (PIN2, LAX2, AUX1, TR2a, IAA11/12) and ethylene-related transcripts (ACS3/7, ASA1, ERF003/109) were lower in trifoliate orange than Micro-Tom tomato cuttings during the earliest stages.
conclusionsOur results confirmed AR formation in trifoliate orange was delayed compared to Micro-tom tomato. The low level IAA hormones, significantly lower expression IAA and ethylene-related genes at the earliest stages could be attributed to the delay of AR formation in trifoliate orange cuttings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40388033What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.